
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
this is the friendly
:):) response from report desk:
Support Team 2013.06.25 11:12
There is no bug.
Please read our documentation
good job metaquotes!
this is the friendly
Support Team 2013.06.25 11:12
There is no bug.
Please read our documentation
good job metaquotes!As usual - denial as a usual way of "communication" we are getting
Doc
Out if curiosity, made this indicator as a test of normalization. It seems to be working OK in this test - maybe you can use it as a template for comparisons (it has normalization and display precision parameters made as external parameters).
PS: it is a fully functional Hull moving average with an addition aof comment of a normalized value of the current bar hull average value
Dear Mladen,
about the indy I did post here, what's the problem at price1? I cannot understand why if you try to insert a very low period, after sometime you got this kind of problem:
Dear Mladen,
about the indy I did post here, what's the problem at price1? I cannot understand why if you try to insert a very low period, after sometime you got this kind of problem:
Doc,
Right now I don't know. What it looks like is that it does not follow the ZigZag values of he last 2 peaks and valleys (since the trend line is determined by 2 sets of time+price values) as it should but the code needs to be checked more thoroughly for that
Does that happen when last leg of the ZigZag changes or in some other case?
Doc,
Right now I don't know. What it looks like is that it does not follow the ZigZag values of he last 2 peaks and valleys (since the trend line is determined by 2 sets of time+price values) as it should but the code needs to be checked more thoroughly for that
Does that happen when last leg of the ZigZag changes or in some other case?"since the trend line is determined by 2 sets of time+price values"
yes, the problem is in price2 bar2 and price1 bar1.
I did try to backtest it, and I did add print output for price 1 and 2...yes it's the last segment as you can see in these pictures:
"since the trend line is determined by 2 sets of time+price values"
yes, the problem is in price2 bar2 and price1 bar1.
I did try to backtest it, and I did add print output for price 1 and 2...yes it's the last segment as you can see in these pictures:
Will have to look at the code thoroughly
Will have to look at the code thoroughly
Thanks,
I have already started
Thanks, I have already started
Funny
Looking at the code, it should work (since it should change the time and price parameters), but for some reason it does not. Oh well ...
Funny Looking at the code, it should work (since it should change the time and price parameters), but for some reason it does not. Oh well ...
Another bug?