You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Pretty straightforward.
I run it over last year.
So i expect the same results, or as some say, even better from the other technique.
I won't have any problem accepting what comes out of this, and i am not trying to push through invalid truths.
Just trying to keep the forum vibrant, a little competition in stead of all the i need, i want, topics.
Pretty straightforward.
I run it over last year.
So i expect the same results, or as some say, even better from the other technique.
I won't have any problem accepting what comes out of this, and i am not trying to push through invalid truths.
Just trying to keep the forum vibrant, a little competition in stead of all the i need, i want, topics.
High Marco,
Here's the code modified to work without hedging.
Sorry,
small error.
Be back soon.
Here's the code for no hedging
Okay thanks, i compiled it and here is the result:
Okay thanks, i compiled it and here is the result:
Please try it on Every Tick, Open prices are no good for testing this type of trading where trades are entered at certain levels.
And, of course, test it against yours over the same data.
Okay they both look very much alike when run every tick.
So ... without applying the so called hedging technique mentioned in this topic, the respected coders on our forum showed that the strategy proposed by Marco can also be implemented in a different way with some additional financial benefits.
In fact, "any arbitrarily selected" strategy can be shown so ... and this universally proves the statement of Keith in his first post "it is not just my opinion that "hedging" in Forex is unproductive and pointless, it is a fact."
Noticed that?
This result agrees with the Occam's Razor, stated as "plurality should not be posited without necessity" or as "entities are not to be multiplied beyond necessity".
So, be simple for perfection ... or namely be simple for saving yourself from additional costs and unnecessary risks without any real benefit in this case.
Happy strategy designing )
Well the show isn't over till the fat lady sings.
Stay tuned.
Okay they both look very much alike when run every tick.
Did you not see that my version produced a slight increase in profit?