
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
the look has improve a lot, however I want to know:
the max. vertical distance between Equity and Balance
it can tell us the signal accuracy
the look has improve a lot, however I want to know:
the max. vertical distance between Equity and Balance
it can tell us the signal accuracy
i am here to know new formula , if u have share with me .
i want to know what is the exact formula of the rating?
This formula is not publicly available.
I suggest to add one more categories to all signals: NO STOP LOSS SIGNALS,
seperate those good signals with no S.L. signals only bind with luckThis is good suggestion. TP-SL is a must.
I see most trader doesnt using SL, it might these Signal Provider using 'martingale' or using 'Trading Balance/arbitrage' technique..... and it's quite dangerous for subscriber,, it's some kind following gambler.... subscriber might get luck today but loose money next week/month.
With strict SL filters, we will able to choose which a really good trader, or just a gambler/trading balancer.
Also, make separate signal provider who already pass 3 years,,, 2 years,,, 1 year,,, & under 1 year...... or at least add this such filter.
I see some signal provider have good rating (appeared on 1st page), in fact only trading few weeks.... We can't decide that signal provider is the best just because he get gain profit 100% in one day/month... .. I'm sure 'MQL5 Signal Provider services' is very wrong here.
And also maybe make some polling/vote/survey, to measure how satisfied all subscriber here.... the polling should be able to modified in future... example maybe a member unsatisfied this week,, but they might satisfied next few month.
what is the exact formula of the rating?
all the discussion is here: Rating System of Trading Signals Improved
what is the exact formula of the rating?
This formula is not publicly available.