You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Thanks for the replies so if am not using M1 price data I should not read much into the history quality
Note that using M15, H1, etc., you also can reach 100% test quality, if you enable tick by tick simulation option.
History quality (%) has nothing to do with the execution mode (Every tick, OHLC, ...). You can obtain 100% quality if you have complete M1 dataset for the testing period, independantly of the timeframe and the execution mode you used.
Do you mean that we can obtain 100% of Test Quality results without tick by tick execution mode option enabled?
I think we are talking about different metrics: History Quality (as show by MT5) and Test Quality (real backtesting quality).
Note that MT5 History Quality can obtain 100%, but if you don't use tick by tick, the number of ticks will be so low in M15, H1, etc., that the Test Quality, for me, is not 100%.
At least, I never would trust in an EA without a final tick by tick test.
Do you mean that we can obtain 100% of Test Quality results without tick by tick execution mode option enabled?
I think we are talking about different metrics: History Quality (as show by MT5) and Test Quality (real backtesting quality).
Note that MT5 History Quality can obtain 100%, but if you don't use tick by tick, the number of ticks will be so low in M15, H1, etc., that the Test Quality, for me, is not 100%.
At least, I never would trust in an EA without a final tick by tick test.
What are you talking about ? There is no such thing as "Test Quality" in MT5, only History Quality sometimes called Data Quality. The question of the topic starter was about Data Quality, nothing else.
Obviously a backtest with execution mode "Every tick" will be more accurate than other execution mode.
What are you talking about ? There is no such thing as "Test Quality" in MT5, only History Quality sometimes called Data Quality. The question of the topic starter was about Data Quality, nothing else.
Obviously a backtest with execution mode "Every tick" will be more accurate than other execution mode.
I will repeat my original phrase before you comment: "Note that using M15, H1, etc., you also can reach 100% test quality, if you enable tick by tick simulation option."
This is just a real market advice to ssn, that I don't know if is so obvious to him.
If so, don't forget that obvious things, sometimes, must also be said here, to help and advice other users.