
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
any chance to make it open source
we mayb able to improve it
any chance to make it open source
we mayb able to improve it
actually i have done 2 EA before, which 1 is open source(mq4), one is only ex4
but i found a Russian and a Chinese sold my project with it's own name !!
which make me feel unpleasant !
and for this EA Steady Growth, it's performance is better than last 2 i did,
so i decided this EA no longer open source
actually i have done 2 EA before, which 1 is open source(mq4), one is only ex4
but i found a Russian and a Chinese sold my project with it's own name !!
which make me feel unpleasant !
and for this EA Steady Growth, it's performance is better than last 2 i did,
so i decided this EA no longer open source
ICIC. I can understand how u feel.
Me myself is a EA developer and also wish that my work is not sold commercially by other people.
do you have any discussion group?
check out my live results, http://www.doshur.com/forex
currently writing my experience of developing EA
Hi Kelly
Sorry for being so thick but I didn't understand that you were updating your first post. I thought the whole point of a thread was that you start at the beginning and reached a working conclusion at the end so I didn't go back and look at the start. I downloaded the 2008 redistributable code and now it runs.
Here is a run on Interbank demo for the last 2 weeks. So it finished about 10% up but it was 30% down at points. PF=1.06.
If I was you I would go to all the major Forex forums and post your EAs that are being sold explaining the situation and suggesting people should download them for free rather than pay for them that would scupper the scoundrels profits.
Thanks
Hi Kelly here is test on same period as yours. Why does it not trade shorts?
It didn't really progress much so I think you have the steady bit right but not the growth :)
Hi Kelly running control points on same period is completely different this you could call growth.
Maybe you should try and mimic its behaviour.
Hi Kelly running control points on same period is completely different this you could call growth.
Maybe you should try and mimic its behaviour.
what are control points bro :(
what are control points bro :(
The back tester model selection has 3 options see
The back tester model selection has 3 options see
thank you ruptor. still blank results :(
thank you ruptor. still blank results :(
What does your journal say?