Discussion of article "MQL5 Market Results for Q1 2013"

 

New article MQL5 Market Results for Q1 2013 is published:

Since its founding, the store of trading robots and technical indicators MQL5 Market has already attracted more than 250 developers who have published 580 products including Expert Advisors (44% of the total number of applications), indicators (35%) and other applications.

The Market has been growing considerably during the first quarter of 2013. The number of downloads of free applications and demo versions of commercial products has almost doubled. As a result, the number of trading application downloads has reached 70 000 since MQL5 Market launch.

Program Downloads Via MQL5 Market

More statistical details and MQL5 Market TOP-10 Sellers you can find in the article "MQL5 Market Results for Q1 2013".

Author: MetaQuotes

 
The leading position in the top 10 is held by a seller under the nickname achidayat. 10 of the top 250 developers sold a quarter of all applications and accounted for 67% of the MQL5 Market turnover. Their experience of selling in the shop is interesting for other developers. Therefore, we intend to address the best sellers and describe their success stories (see, for example, the article about Jeremy Scott).<br/ translate="no">.

Now all that is left is to create a "Top Sellers", open sales statistics - and reality will very quickly get lost in marketing fiction because of marketing gimmicks. The example is already there.

And success stories - publish, it will be interesting to read. All the more, so far, the success stories of salespeople are innocent and pure. There are no sales statistics, no top, no passions. You should hurry with the interview, the first sincere steps are always interesting. It's later that competitiveness and greed will appear and it will be business as usual.

Only the article about Jeremy Scott was too short, on some understatement. It should be more about "success story".

 
And there will be a lot of threads about reformatting the market vendors.
 
abolk:

Now all that's left to do is create "top sellers", open up sales statistics - and reality will very quickly get lost in marketing fiction because of marketing gimmicks. There is already an example.

And success stories - publish, it will be interesting to read. All the more, so far, the success stories of salespeople are innocent and pure. There are no sales statistics, no top, no passions. You should hurry with the interview, the first sincere steps are always interesting. It's later that competitiveness and greed will appear and it will be business as usual.

Only the article about Jeremy Scott was too short, on some understatement. There needs to be a fuller 'success story'.

They say that in the future there may either be a section about Market/Signals on the forum, or (more likely) a discussion of each product/signal in a 'how to articles' format. I hope that something can be implemented there for us (users).

And overall the article is a good one.

 
newdigital:

They say that in the future there could be either a section about Market/Signals on the forum, or (more likely) a discussion of each product/signal in a 'how to articles' format. I hope that something can be implemented there for us (users).

And overall the article is good.

It should have been done in the first place. Just like in CodeBase.
 
Vladon:
That should have been done in the first place. Just like in CodeBase.

Why would you want a Marketplace seller to have an individual discussion of a product?

Top, statistics, individual discussion, yellow rating stars, articles about success -- these are all tools for marketing tricks - there is a real example in Work how it all works and what it leads to.

MK should create an unbiased marketplace. The maximum that can be done for this is a demo version + reviews + high commission.

"Yellow rating stars" should even be removed, because they are put on the basis of feedback, and there may be no feedback - it is already a biased bias in the evaluations.

 
abolk:

Why do you need a Marketplace seller - individual product discussion?

Top, statistics, individual discussion, yellow rating stars, articles about success -- these are all tools for marketing tricks - there is a real example in Work how it all works and what it leads to.

MK should create an unbiased marketplace. The maximum that can be done for this is a demo version + reviews + high commission.

"Yellow rating stars" should even be removed, because they are given based on feedback, and there may be no feedback - there is already a biased bias in evaluations.

Sometimes it is necessary to discuss the programme somewhere, because people write the same strange questions to me:

One-click trading panel - How can I test it in the tester? It doesn't open trades, that's how?

 
Vladon:

sometimes you need somewhere to discuss a programme, because people write the same strange questions to me:

One-click trading panel - And how to test it in the tester? it doesn't open trades, is that how?

as far as I understand - in the presentation of the programme in the Market - there is an opportunity to describe the programme + show screens = this is not enough? Do you need more? Use your website for a more detailed description.

But you understand very well (besides, there is a vivid example in Work)) that "good intentions" in the form of statistics, top, discussion, rating - in the end, marketing tricks of clever people lead to discrediting of these "good intentions".

 
abolk:

As far as I understand - in the presentation of the programme in the Market - there is an opportunity to describe the programme + show screens = this is not enough? Do you need more? Use your site for a more detailed description.

But you understand very well (besides, there is a vivid example in Work)) that "good intentions" in the form of statistics, top, discussion, rating - in the end, marketing tricks of clever people lead to discrediting of these "good intentions".

in the presentation of the programme in the Market - there is an opportunity to describe the programme + show screens = this is not enough.

You think I don't write anything in the description :-)

Use your site for a more detailed description

I use it and then what? You can't put a link to the page in the description,

But you understand perfectly well (besides, there is a vivid example in Work))),

I understand, but also articles on the topic of top developers - I do not understand the article, where did the top developers come from, on what principle it was written, on the principle of who will bring more money?

 
There's an article on Jeremy to help you. It says he is distributing a limited free version.
 

One-click trading panel - How to test it in the tester? It doesn't open trades, that's how?

It means that a user downloads the PANEL and asks why it does not open trades in the tester? i.e. he thinks that it is an automatic robot in the form of a panel.

What's the free version? It's there. But it doesn't change the matter. Some of the buyers don't read what they download. They don't care if it's a panel, and it won't open a transaction until the user clicks on the button.