Evgeniy Scherbina / Profil
- Information
|
12+ Jahre
Erfahrung
|
33
Produkte
|
597
Demoversionen
|
|
0
Jobs
|
0
Signale
|
0
Abonnenten
|
The new approach uses days and does not use weeks and months to analyze the market. So it should react much quicker to the changing environment. And help avoid long-running drawdowns. And of course it should trade more actively.
It has been mostly buy positions for Gold for many weeks. I guess it will (because it should) change with the new update this week.
I already had this picture before. I like it that much.
If you have many open trades and you do not want QP to close them all, you may want to change the magic. Remember: it should be a number different by 2 digits from the current number. It still uses 2 strategies, so it uses 2 magics: magic2 = magic1 + 1.
Earlier this year, I thought of adding different supporting symbols, like Oil, Stock indices and smth else. I think this idea can be implemented in QuantumPip version 2.4. I am testing it right now.
Come on! Let's grab all the profit as soon as it shows up!
Below is the comparison picture. The current 2.2 version has not managed it well enough in the last month. The newest 2.3 version, that I am going to publish over the weekend, has a much better result with the Reliable risk. Of course, it is a test with the unknown, future data for the 2.3 version.
I have reduced the complexity of the networks. They say if a simple model performs as well or better as a complex model, you should use the simple model. This is what I am going to do.
Some uses have experienced bugs due to insufficient data. It will all be gone.
There will be one supporting symbol - XAUUSD.
It will be a choppier trading. So there will more trades and more signal changes. It is better because it should help avoid long-range traps as it has happened with USDJPY this summer.
Of course, it will work as usual with the existing trades. However, I guess most trades will be closed by the newer version. So you may want to change the magic. Also, the newer version will have a new comment "qpip" to replace the current comment "qp".
Der Experte "Neural Transformer" ist ein vollautomatischer Experte, der für den Handel auf dem täglichen Zeitrahmen mit 2 Symbolen bereit ist: GBPUSD und USDCAD. Darüber hinaus können Sie den Experten für den Handel auf einem beliebigen Zeitrahmen mit einem beliebigen Symbol trainieren. Der Experte übernimmt automatisch die Dateien Ihres neuen angepassten neuronalen Netzwerks. Der "Neural Transformer" hat das Training neuronaler Netzwerke für den Forex-Handel zu einem einfachen und spannenden
Here comes the name for the new product! Boom-boom tram-pam... "Neural Transformer"!
What it means is that USD should let it go. AUDUSD, EURUSD, GBPUSD may instantly go upwards, while USDCAD, USDCHF, USDJPY will head downwards.
The questions is: Will this move in currencies take place after the conference on July 31st or later in September?
My answer is: It will happen this Wednesday. I am going to remove all positions favoring USD. And I recommend doing so to you.
My major symbols are: AUDCAD, AUD, EUR, GBPCHF, GBP, CAD, CHF, JPY, and SEK. While the supporting symbols are: Oil, Dixie, Dax, Ftse, and Gold. Yes, you got it right! I have finally incorporated stock indices into Forex trading. All of which is available with any broker, because the rare and valuable staff is downloaded from Yahoo Finance.
What we see in this chart, is that Oil, Dixie, Dax and Gold are mostly winning. The one loser is Ftse. Oil lost 2 major symbols in the test period Jan-May 2024, while Dixie lost only one major symbol. But Dixie has the highest drawdown of 10% on SEK, together with Ftse. The drawdowns are not shown in this chart, but surely it is not only about how tall the columns are.
I think I will put it all together in one strategy, including the losing Ftse, so that everyone knows what an amazing and extensive testing has been done to achieve these results. While Oil should be the preferred choice, the other options will add confidence to it.
It uses the American Dollar Index, or "Dixie", as a supporting symbol.
LuminaFX check it out here: https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/114681
LuminaFX ist ein vollautomatischer Experte, der mit 8 Symbolen aus einem Chart handelt. Der Experte implementiert eine beliebte Version des rekurrenten neuronalen Modells. Die Werte des "Schmuksie"-Indikators (meine Adaption des amerikanischen Dollar-Index DXY, oder "Dixie") werden als Input für das neuronale Modell verwendet. Sie können einen kostenlosen Indikator IDixie herunterladen und ihn mit dem Experten LuminaFX auf einen Chart setzen. IDixie berechnet die Schlusskurse des amerikanischen
а на RannForex он как USDX - наверное надо передавать имя символа советнику в параметрах?
Пошёл тестить на IC Markets ;)
Likewise, right now I am seeing that it is QuantumPip slowing down, while LuminaFX is really pushing up. They differ in the way inputs are fed: stacked sequences for QuantumPip, ordered sequences for LuminaFX. There is a reason why they may be opening opposite trades.
And as we all know, it is better to open more trades because more risk creates more profit. If the forecast quality is at least 51% (it is so for both QuantumPip and LuminaFX), a lot of trades would always be winning at the end of a month. A few good trades may be pure luck, it may last 1 month, 2 months... But a lot of trades will always create enough opportunities to grab profits!!
What do you think?
Der Experte "QuantumPip" ist ein vollautomatischer Experte, der mehrere Symbole aus einem Chart handeln kann. Der Experte verwendet auch Preise von Gold, Öl, Dixie, DAX oder FTSE, um Eingaben für die Symbole zu berechnen. Der Experte verwendet 2 Arten von rekurrenten neuronalen Modellen - 1 Netzwerk (Entscheidungen "Kauf" oder "Verkauf") und 2 Netzwerke (Entscheidungen "Kauf" oder "Unsicherheit" und "Verkauf" oder "Unsicherheit"). QuantumPip kann daher 20 Strategien wie eine einzige handeln, da
The thing is QuantumPip, which is my most advanced system so far, still shows better results. I can't make LuminaFX outperform QuantumPip. But I will keep on searching. I think if the past has the same random prices as the future does, a good strategy should be able to pass the history with a satisfactory result. LuminaFX struggles to do it. Do I have to come to the conclusion that it is different: To be able to pass the random prices of the future, a good strategy should not fit to the prices of the past at all???
IDixie ist ein Indikator, der die Eröffnungs- und Schlusswerte des amerikanischen Dollar-Index, DXY oder "Dixie", anzeigt. Der Indikator wird aus den gewichteten Werten der 6 wichtigsten Symbole berechnet: EURUSD, USDJPY, GBPUSD, USDCAD, USDSEK, und USDCHF. Zusätzlich zu den "Dixie"-Werten zeigt der Indikator auch einen gleitenden Durchschnitt an. Sie können die Periode des gleitenden Durchschnitts einstellen. Wenn die Balken des Indikators den gleitenden Durchschnitt durchbrechen, ergeben sich
Der Indikator IQuantum zeigt Handelssignale für 10 Symbole im Tageschart an: AUDCAD, AUDUSD, EURUSD, GBPCAD, GBPCHF, GBPUSD, NZDUSD, USDCAD, USDCHF und USDJPY. Signale des Indikators werden von 2 neuronalen Modellen erzeugt, die unabhängig voneinander trainiert wurden. Die Inputs für die neuronalen Modelle sind normalisierte Preise der Symbole, sowie Preise von Gold, Silber und Markern des aktuellen Tages. Jedes neuronale Modell wurde auf 2 Arten trainiert. Der ultimative Modus ist ein
The good thing to know is it can't grow endlessly. It must fall. There is no level that is higher than 2100. So no target value to reach and to roll back. It can roll back any day. Any time. Can it roll back today?
The bad thing, or the bad consequence is evident. No one expected it to grow that high. It just broke all indicators. It has made us incur losses and suffer the pain of frustration. It is not fair! Go back, you brick of bright shiny gold! Go back now!
My two advisors - Gold Chaser and Neural Rabbit - both trade Gold. Their neural model for Gold is identical, and it could not foresee the trend beyond 2100 because it has never happened in the history on which it was trained. Clearly, I will have to retrain the model. To avoid that kind of miscalculation in the future, I am going to try the following ways:
1) Extend the training period.
2) Drop the trade-off between a good historical chart and a good performance on the unseen future data. What this means, is I tried with these 2 advisors to accomodate the 2 approaches. I wanted to please those traders who want to be sure it can pass the history well. And I tried to find such values of neural loss which would allow the strategy make correct trading decisions on the unseen future data. That is why it broke. No more trade-offs! Trade-offs don't work! Or else they work until the market spirals out of control.
3) My latest approach is to leave out 75% of training data to avoid repetitions in the training dataset and make it less addicted to such repetitions. The following validation includes a 100% of the dataset, so I can always make sure it is a valid neural model.
We do not succumb to the frustration wrought by the power of the unwinding market! We adapt and we become stronger! Profit will be ours!




