When I run the optimizer in v8.1, I'm seeing this message ==>> "Scalper Inside PRO AUDJPYc,M5; array out of range in 'Scalper Inside PRO v8.1.mq4' (9094, 17)"

Please advise. Thanks in advance.

Hi, I think you don't have enough history for calculations.

You need to load more historical data for the calculation. I recommend enabling the function in the settings that checks if there is enough historical data for the calculation:

In this video, you can learn how to load historical data into the MetaTrader 4 terminal:

---

By the way, I just looked at the historical data check and thought of a couple of improvements to avoid issues with verification. I'll fix this in the next update. Thanks for pointing it out!

---

💎  UPDATE: SCALPER INSIDE PRO v8.2 💎

Hello, my friends! ❤️

A minor update with fixes to the algorithms for checking the amount of historical data.

In the new version, I decided to enable the historical data check by default, as it is useful and necessary in most cases. Just a reminder: the historical data check is activated with the following setting:

The recommended amount of historical data is just a guideline. If for some reason your broker provides insufficient historical data for certain financial assets and you can't download more, you can turn off this setting (set to ‘false’). The indicator will correctly perform calculations with the available historical data.

Here's a short video on how to download some historical data without using History Center in the terminal:

---

Hi. Some of our friends might use the Samurai add-on on BTC/USD, but I don't think it's very practical. This add-on doesn’t look great on BTC/USD and lacks customization options to adjust it.

For example, just look at Strategy 1 on the hourly timeframe. Even with default settings and without optimization, it looks much more interesting than Samurai on the same instrument. It might also be helpful to enable Delta Entry mode for opening positions and set a larger Delta to avoid price touching the entry level prematurely before the price gains enough momentum to reach its targets.

I also want to add:

P.S. My friends, please be patient just a bit longer. I'm currently doing a major rebranding and developing a new manual with lots of details on how to use the Scalper Inside Pro indicator and my other products. After that, I plan to share more practical tips and secrets for using the indicator in your work. It's going to be exciting! Stay tuned - there’s a lot of interesting stuff coming up!

Let's just look at a couple of examples from today:

Buy position on EURUSD - should we stand to TP3 level?

Let's take a peek at H1:

We see that the price is hitting quite strong levels. Can the price break through these levels and move further? Absolutely, yes.

Is it worth the wait? If you have the time and will, as well as the ability to watch the live chart, then yes, of course. You can set the position to breakeven and watch how candles will be built near an important level. If there is no time, we take a profit on TP3:

Next one:

Why closed at TP3?

Similar to the previous example - there is a risk of price pullback from a strong level:

Bitcoin:

Why fixed on TP3? The same reason again - not to follow the movement, but to do their own thing.

Is there a solution? Yes, and even several. You can simply trail the stop level following the price when, for example, we are close to TP2 or TP3 and then you can grab a little more. You can also trail the stop level using the HTF-Trailing Advice System:

The important thing is that there are no perfect and 100% solutions and 100% answers. Practice decides and with time everything will seem much easier than in the beginning.

---

Hi friends,

I apologize for being distracted by new trading notes instead of finally finishing the rebranding and getting more involved in publishing this kind of material. But I just couldn't resist showing you a couple more trades to demonstrate the advantages of market analysis using Scalper Inside Pro—I think this information will be useful for you.

So, here is EURAUD:

Here we follow the classic: we reached TP3 and a strong level on the way - take a profit.

---

The picture here is basically the same as in the previous example. But here is an example of how HTF Trailing Level can help in estimating and setting the stop level.

---

And here's an example on USDJPY:

It has nothing particularly notable about it except that I wanted to show you the previous signal and remind you of the importance of what I mentioned earlier regarding signals that appear just before market close.

A signal directly before market close—opening such a position over the weekend can be a risky endeavor. Try to avoid such signals that appear shortly before trading closes for the weekend.

I will allow myself to quote from my own message:

---

And one more educative example. In this case, the positions are set to break even overall. Look at the logic here. I intentionally cut off the right side of the graph so you can see the market situation at the time the decision was made:

Basically, the logic here is simple. Look, the price on both charts has already reached TP2 before starting to retreat on both graphs. I mentioned earlier that the task of the Scalper Inside Pro indicator is to catch an impulse that will quickly lead to achieving targets. In our example, there's an initial impulse but it’s not very strong. We see that a correction starts and this is usually not a good sign. Earlier, I also noted that in such cases, it's better to pay closer attention to the price.

So in the end, we reached TP2 and the price started to slowly reverse. If there are any doubts, it’s better to secure break-even than stay in an unpredictable market. That’s what was done.

In summary:

P.S. Study the market and go with the flow of trends. Well, that’s all for now - I’m going back to updating and preparing new materials for you.

---

Hello,

Thank you for your purchase. I have sent you a message.

---

Hello, my friends! ❤️

I'm pleased to present another update for our beloved indicator, Scalper Inside Pro.

⚠️ Attention, the appearance of the updated version on the Market may take some time before it becomes available for download! This is related to product re-indexing. Please be patient – the new version will be available soon!

🔺🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻

✅ Improvements to the Custom Indicators working module

✅ Improvements to the alert module

🔺🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻

In the Alerts section of the indicator's settings, a new option has appeared:

Let's look at what this does. To do that, first, remember how the TP1-TP3 touch alerts operated in earlier versions of the indicator.

When the price touched one of the levels, the indicator didn't immediately recalculate the data and send an alert. It did so only when the current candle closed and a new one opened – in other words, it worked based on opening prices. This was done to reduce CPU load. Because if the indicator were applied to many financial assets simultaneously, and we had to track them all in tick-by-tick mode, it would significantly increase CPU usage.

This resulted in some inconvenience because we only received a signal once per candle/bar. Honestly, I had almost forgotten about this situation myself. But thanks to one of our friends, I was brought back to this point, and I found a fairly elegant solution to this problem.

So, when the Realtime Alerts for TP1-TP3 mode is activated, the indicator starts tracking price touches of the TP1-TP3 levels and immediately sends an alert upon occurrence. However… The data recalculation happens after the candle closes. This way, we get both a timely alert and avoid overloading the system, even if the indicator is applied to multiple financial assets simultaneously.

Here's how it works in practice now. When the price touches one of the levels, the indicator immediately sends an Alert and first colors the touch point gray:

How the alerts themselves look, for example:

And already upon opening the next bar after the price has touched a level, the indicator performs a recalculation of statistics taking into account the new results and marks the level touch with bright green color:

---

Ciao,

come posso fare per cambiare strategia?

grazie mille

Hi,

The strategy is selected in the indicator settings:

  You can get instructions on working with the indicator and much more by following the link from the indicator description:

https://www.mql5.com/en/blogs/post/758968

Hi, I just bought the SI Pro, may I have the settings of XAUUSD and EURUSD on 5 mins chart?

Thank you. Best luck to all of us!

Hi,

Thanks for the purchase. 

As for the exact settings, there are no 100% the right decisions, as much depends on the broker quotes, the timeframe used and the current market situation. This is due to the fact that instruments that some time ago did not show good results, now may show good results, and vice versa. At the same time, even the default settings will be good for work in most cases, if you use additional filters. You can read more about it in the indicator manual:

https://www.mql5.com/en/blogs/post/758968

Also, in one of the latest versions of the indicator, an integrated optimizer for all three strategies was added. This allows you to quickly assess if a financial asset is suitable for trading and also helps quickly find the most appropriate settings. 

For example, without optimization:

With optimization:

Without optimization:

With optimization:

---

And default settings:

---

💎 UPDATE: SCALPER INSIDE PRO v8.34 💎 

Hello, my friends! ❤️ 

I'm pleased to present another update for our beloved indicator, Scalper Inside Pro. 

I'm glad to present to your attention a revolutionary update to the Scalper Inside Pro indicator. This time, it's about a very important improvement to the optimization module, which opens up even more possibilities when working with the indicator. 

⚠️ Attention, the appearance of the updated version on the Market may take some time before it becomes available for download! This is related to product re-indexing. Please be patient – the new version will be available soon!

🔺🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻 

✅ Update and enhancement of the optimization module 

✅ Other minor code improvements 

🔺🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻 

I spent a long time testing and experimenting with the optimization module, aiming to maintain a balance between achieving a high WR% and preserving a sufficiently large number of signals to avoid over-optimization. And in the new version of the Scalper Inside Pro indicator v8.34, I managed to find an interesting solution that will allow for greater flexibility when approaching the optimization process. 

Let's first look at how the optimization process generally looked in previous versions of the indicator. I often mentioned that the built-in optimization module is not mandatory for operation and you can quite manage without it. But at the same time, it is very convenient to quickly evaluate whether a financial asset is suitable for trading or not. We can install the indicator on an asset we are interested in, load historical data, and use optimization to quickly get the most suitable options. 

--- 

So, the new variable available in the indicator settings under the section -== OPTIMIZATION SETTINGS ==- is called 'Minimum Number of Signals for the Optimizer'.

With a value of 0, the calculation will be performed as before – automatically, without considering the minimum desired number of signals. 

--- 

With the enhanced panel activated, we can now see a line called 'Min Signals', displaying the value of the variable 'Minimum Number of Signals for the Optimizer'. 

This shows us the minimum acceptable number of signals over the specified time period (Bars Used) for which the built-in optimizer will attempt to find optimal parameters:

Let's move on to examples. 

Here is the EURJPY chart with a zero value for the 'Minimum Number of Signals for the Optimizer' variable. This means automatic mode operation (as in previous versions).

Now set the desired number of signals for which the calculation will be made. 

For the M5 timeframe and a period of 10,000 bars, I preferred an option with 80-90 signals for optimization. Therefore, we set the 'Minimum Number of Signals for the Optimizer' variable to 90. Then, we launch the built-in optimizer and examine the results:

As you can see, the number of signals over that same time period increased from 42 to 101. It's slightly more than 90, but this is a feature of optimization – the indicator selected the number most suitable and closest to our specified value while also trying to achieve the maximum WR%. At the same time, we see that in our case, the WR% decreased only slightly – from 88.1% down to 87.1%, which many might find preferable, as a larger number of signals provides more opportunities. However, if you trade a large number of financial instruments, an increase in the number of signals may be less relevant for you. I remind you again that much depends on your trading style and habits. 

--- 

Next example is with Gold. 

The setting for the number of signals for optimization is set to default (0 = AUTO):

Got 59 signals. Next, we change the variable to 90 and see what we get:

We slightly lose on the WR%, but at the same time, we get twice as many signals on that same time period. 

--- 

Next is BTCUSD, default settings:

Got 49 signals. Increasing the variable value:

It increased to 87 signals. And let's increase the variable value further for an experiment:

We got a total of 145 signals, which is almost three times the initial number of signals. 

--- 

In general, as you can see, this variable gives us a multitude of new possibilities. 

I don't recommend setting too large a number of signals, but nevertheless, you can try various parameters to obtain results most suitable for your trading style. 

---

Good Day Alexey,

I am using your indicators for a week already, it's awesome!

I have a few quick questions:

1. How often should we go optimization? 

2. Could we could count the WR by using HTF trailing stop? if not, may you add this feature in the next update, so that we could have more accurate tools to build up the success trades.

3. I found there's a little bug that (please check the image below), there was an entry point at 1.1431 (red circled) and endup it with an Reversal SL, but the system doesn't count this as a loss. May you fix this in the next update?

Thank you and Good luck to all of us!