I made a small interim summary and I’m also showing a screenshot so that my review is authentic and the EA works exactly as described.

The EA is added to run in parallel with other EAs on the same account without any issues, and I filtered and displayed the screenshot information in the FXer platform.

Awesome results! May I know what is your account size?

10k+ and 4% risk

Hi  I have purchased your EA. can you send me the setfile
and the bonus 😊.. Thank you 

Hi, I’ve purchased your EA, but I’m having an issue.

Hi Maryam, the strategy of this EA is to place pending orders at certain psychological levels. We are waiting for these levels to be tested for a trade to happen. The EA does not place many random trades but instead waits for high probability trades to ensure good results! The EA is working perfectly fine, do not worry. 😁

Hi Maryam, you can find them here: https://c.mql5.com/31/1530/Golden_Tiger_EA_V1.44_Updated_Set_Files.zip

Why use the latest version of EA to backtest the date after the release of this version, which is so different from the previous performance？

I have reason to doubt the authenticity of this EA

Don't talk about other useless things, isn't three months enough to verify authenticity?

Hello,

v1.46 was released on 10 October 2025. Could you clarify which earlier version you are comparing it against? The changes from the previous version are limited. The main adjustment was to the trailing stop logic to make it more responsive to price movement. There was no fundamental change to the core strategy.

If your own live results differ from your backtests, the most common reasons are spread and slippage. These vary significantly by broker and market conditions. Even with a reputable broker like ICMarkets, I still experience widened spreads and delayed execution, which can change entry timing and turn what would be a backtest win into a live loss.

It’s also important to note that the last two months have been extremely volatile for XAUUSD. Backtests cannot accurately replicate real-time spreads, slippage, or execution behavior during such conditions. Even when using “Every tick based on real ticks” and achieving 90%+ modeling quality, backtests are still approximations, not a perfect reflection of live trading.

Three months can help evaluate behavior, but it does not eliminate the structural differences between backtesting and live execution. This applies to any EA, not just this one.

If your concern is the difference between backtest results and the live signal on my account, there is a reason. On my own live account, I have increased risk and experimented with different parameter settings. That alone will cause performance to diverge from historical backtests done with default or conservative settings. With the increased risk and increased number of losses in the past few weeks my account has suffered drastically.

If you have specific test settings, broker details, or data ranges you want to compare, feel free to share them so we can look at the differences more objectively.

Please feel free to contact me in my private message as well and we can discuss there further, I also still have the files for previous versions of the EA, so if you would like to do a comparison do let me know.

Simply beautiful.

Here's my recent entry