|
no
경험
|
2
제품
|
12
데모 버전
|
|
0
작업
|
0
거래 신호
|
0
구독자
|
저는 2014년부터 트레이딩을 해왔으며, 그 중심에는 항상 금(XAUUSD)이 있었습니다. 그동안 다양한 금융상품에 걸쳐 셀 수 없이 많은 전략을 테스트했고, 수없이 실패도 경험했습니다. 하지만 그 실패들은 어떤 큰 수익보다도 더 많은 것을 가르쳐 주었습니다. 진정한 적은 시장이 아니라 스트레스와 감정, 그리고 스스로 세운 원칙을 깨고 싶은 유혹이라는 사실이었습니다.
그러한 경험들이 지금의 저를 만들었습니다. 10년이 넘는 트레이딩에서 얻은 성공과 실패의 교훈을 바탕으로, 감정을 배제하고 규율을 일관되게 지킬 수 있는 자동매매 시스템을 개발하게 되었습니다.
제가 만드는 시스템은 **리스크 관리(Risk First)**를 최우선으로 하는 추세추종(Trend Following) 전략입니다. 그리드(Grid), 마틴게일(Martingale), 물타기(Averaging) 방식은 사용하지 않습니다. 또한 어떤 제품이든 출시하기 전에 수년에 걸친 실제 틱 데이터(Real Tick Data)를 활용한 워크포워드 테스트(Walk-Forward Testing)를 통해 엄격하게 검증합니다.
저는 화려한 수익률보다 장기적으로 살아남고 꾸준히 복리로 성장하는 것을 훨씬 더 중요하게 생각합니다. 그래서 제가 공개하는 모든 제품에는 장점뿐만 아니라 최대 낙폭(Drawdown)과 한계까지도 솔직하게 문서화합니다. 저 역시 구매자라면 그런 정직함을 기대할 것이기 때문입니다.
제 제품을 사용하시다가 설정이나 사용에 도움이 필요하시면 언제든지 제품 페이지를 통해 문의해 주세요. 직접 답변드리겠습니다.
그러한 경험들이 지금의 저를 만들었습니다. 10년이 넘는 트레이딩에서 얻은 성공과 실패의 교훈을 바탕으로, 감정을 배제하고 규율을 일관되게 지킬 수 있는 자동매매 시스템을 개발하게 되었습니다.
제가 만드는 시스템은 **리스크 관리(Risk First)**를 최우선으로 하는 추세추종(Trend Following) 전략입니다. 그리드(Grid), 마틴게일(Martingale), 물타기(Averaging) 방식은 사용하지 않습니다. 또한 어떤 제품이든 출시하기 전에 수년에 걸친 실제 틱 데이터(Real Tick Data)를 활용한 워크포워드 테스트(Walk-Forward Testing)를 통해 엄격하게 검증합니다.
저는 화려한 수익률보다 장기적으로 살아남고 꾸준히 복리로 성장하는 것을 훨씬 더 중요하게 생각합니다. 그래서 제가 공개하는 모든 제품에는 장점뿐만 아니라 최대 낙폭(Drawdown)과 한계까지도 솔직하게 문서화합니다. 저 역시 구매자라면 그런 정직함을 기대할 것이기 때문입니다.
제 제품을 사용하시다가 설정이나 사용에 도움이 필요하시면 언제든지 제품 페이지를 통해 문의해 주세요. 직접 답변드리겠습니다.
Davoud Mokhtari
خیلی جالبه! وقتی یه نوشتهای رو پابلیش میکنم و توش حرف هایی زده میشه که به نفع تازه کارها هست و مردم رو از اشتباه باز میداره و راهنمایی میکنه ، درجا توسط "تیم بررسی" با بهونه های مختلف حذف میشه!!
تو انجمنی که منتشر کرده بودم داشتیم در مورد واقعیتهای بازار حرف میزدیم ولی یهو "تیم بررسی" گفتن که داریم واسه یه محصولی تبلیغ میکنیم! 😂 و خلاصه حذفش کردن کلا!
به هر حال تمام بازارهای مالی ، پر از مافیاست! نمیذارن کسی راحت اطلاعات مفید بده که! چون کار و کاسبیشون خراب میشه!
چند وقت پیش یه چیزی پست کردم راجع به اینکه چطوری ربات های گرید، مارتینگل ، هج و ریکاوری رو تشخیص بدیم
یک نوع آموزش به مردم بود. اینکه با بررسی پارامتر های بک تست بشه فهمید واقعا اون ربات یه چیز واقعیه یا الکی و اُوِرفیت شده هست یا دارای استراتژی های خطرناکه!
تا گذاشتمش ، فرداش بن شدم با این بهونه که داری از هوش مصنوعی استفاده میکنی ، نباید استفاده کنی! 😂
خلاصه همه اینا نشون میده که سیستم علاقهای به آگاه سازی مردم نداره چون اگه مردم آگاه بشن به ضرر ایناست!
تو انجمنی که منتشر کرده بودم داشتیم در مورد واقعیتهای بازار حرف میزدیم ولی یهو "تیم بررسی" گفتن که داریم واسه یه محصولی تبلیغ میکنیم! 😂 و خلاصه حذفش کردن کلا!
به هر حال تمام بازارهای مالی ، پر از مافیاست! نمیذارن کسی راحت اطلاعات مفید بده که! چون کار و کاسبیشون خراب میشه!
چند وقت پیش یه چیزی پست کردم راجع به اینکه چطوری ربات های گرید، مارتینگل ، هج و ریکاوری رو تشخیص بدیم
یک نوع آموزش به مردم بود. اینکه با بررسی پارامتر های بک تست بشه فهمید واقعا اون ربات یه چیز واقعیه یا الکی و اُوِرفیت شده هست یا دارای استراتژی های خطرناکه!
تا گذاشتمش ، فرداش بن شدم با این بهونه که داری از هوش مصنوعی استفاده میکنی ، نباید استفاده کنی! 😂
خلاصه همه اینا نشون میده که سیستم علاقهای به آگاه سازی مردم نداره چون اگه مردم آگاه بشن به ضرر ایناست!
Davoud Mokhtari
It's quite interesting! Whenever I publish a topic , post or an article that contains information benefiting beginners and helping people avoid common mistakes, it gets removed by the moderators almost immediately, usually under one excuse or another.We were discussing the reality of the markets and how they actually work, but suddenly the moderator assumed we were promoting a product!
A while ago, my account was even banned for a week because of this. It seems the system isn't very interested in letting people become more informed! 😄
Hah.. Funny!!
A while ago, my account was even banned for a week because of this. It seems the system isn't very interested in letting people become more informed! 😄
Hah.. Funny!!
· 2
전체 댓글 표시 (10)
Jason Smith
2026.07.24
I’ll mention one last thing. A certain moderator once said in a post that all EAs are useless unless you buy from active forum members. Yet when a developer makes a post, it can result in removal or a ban. That feels like a double standard and gives the impression that the system is rigged
Davoud Mokhtari
2026.07.24
Come on, the Service Desk's job is to provide support. If they can't even do that, then what's the point? And that's exactly the issue. The moderators shouldn't be in a position to judge or censor everything people post. Isn't freedom of speech supposed to exist?
Davoud Mokhtari
2026.07.24
That's exactly it! They need to be able to promote garbage products and attract people toward them with empty promises! People always love hearing what they want to hear. So when they hear things like, "Come on, use this robot and turn your money into 10 times more in 5 months!" they immediately get excited and go for it. They even pay money for it. Then after some time, their money disappears. So who actually benefited from this? 😀 My whole point is that the moderator is simply not in a position to decide whether what I say is right or wrong! Who is the moderator to make that kind of judgment anyway?
Davoud Mokhtari
This is the English version , translated by AI :
I've been trading for about 13 years, and I think this is the lesson that cost me the most. I really wish someone had told me this from the beginning.
For years my strategies all followed the same pattern. they'd work well for a while, and then suddenly stop working! Everyone would say "That's normal. Markets change."
I tested every type of strategy on every kind of instrument I could think of. The result was always one of three outcomes : either it lost money from the start, it worked for a short period, or over the long run it just broke even! No meaningful profit, no meaningful loss.
For a long time, I genuinely believed that no trading strategy could survive in the long run.
Then I decided to stop trading my strategies manually. Instead I converted them into code exactly as I traded them by hand and ran them through years of real historical data.
That gave me a much clearer picture of how each strategy actually performed across completely different market regimes such as trending markets , ranging and volatile markets , market crashes, and quiet periods!
That's when everything finally clicked. You know?
The strategies that had seemed to "suddenly stop working" were never truly robust strategies in the first place. They had simply been making money by chance during a specific market period. I only realized this after running 15 year backtests. That's when their true character became obvious!
From that point on , I decided that before doing anything else , I would first turn any strategy idea that looked interesting into an algorithm and see whether it could actually survive for many years. If it did, then I'd start evaluating its performance in detail.
The biggest lesson for me was this:
A strategy that hasn't been tested across different market regimes doesn't have a real edge yet. It's just a hypothesis that hasn't revealed its true nature and it can absolutely destroy you. 😁
I've been trading for about 13 years, and I think this is the lesson that cost me the most. I really wish someone had told me this from the beginning.
For years my strategies all followed the same pattern. they'd work well for a while, and then suddenly stop working! Everyone would say "That's normal. Markets change."
I tested every type of strategy on every kind of instrument I could think of. The result was always one of three outcomes : either it lost money from the start, it worked for a short period, or over the long run it just broke even! No meaningful profit, no meaningful loss.
For a long time, I genuinely believed that no trading strategy could survive in the long run.
Then I decided to stop trading my strategies manually. Instead I converted them into code exactly as I traded them by hand and ran them through years of real historical data.
That gave me a much clearer picture of how each strategy actually performed across completely different market regimes such as trending markets , ranging and volatile markets , market crashes, and quiet periods!
That's when everything finally clicked. You know?
The strategies that had seemed to "suddenly stop working" were never truly robust strategies in the first place. They had simply been making money by chance during a specific market period. I only realized this after running 15 year backtests. That's when their true character became obvious!
From that point on , I decided that before doing anything else , I would first turn any strategy idea that looked interesting into an algorithm and see whether it could actually survive for many years. If it did, then I'd start evaluating its performance in detail.
The biggest lesson for me was this:
A strategy that hasn't been tested across different market regimes doesn't have a real edge yet. It's just a hypothesis that hasn't revealed its true nature and it can absolutely destroy you. 😁
· 1
Davoud Mokhtari
من حدود ۱۳ سال معامله کردم و فکر میکنم این موضوع بیشترین هزینه را برایم داشت و خیلی دوست داشتم کسی از اول بهم گفته بود :
سالها استراتژیهام اینطوری بودن که یه مدتی خوب کار میکردن و بعد دیگه از کار میوفتادن و دیگه اون استراتژی جواب نمیداد! همه میگفتن طبیعیه ، بازارها که ثابت نیستن.. هر نوع استراتژیای رو روی هر نوع ابزاری تست کردم. نتیجه همیشه یکی از این سه چیز بود:
یا مستقیم ضرر میداد، یا یه مدت کوتاه خوب کار میکرد، یا توی بلند مدت میدیدی که سر به سر هستی ! نه سود خاصی کردی نه ضرر خاصی.
برای مدت طولانی واقعاً باور داشتم که هیچ استراتژیای توی بلندمدت کار نمیکند! تا اینکه تصمیم گرفتم که دیگه استراتژی معاملاتیم را دستی معامله نکنم، بلکه دقیقاً همانطور که دستی معامله میکردم، به کد تبدیلشون کنم و بعد روی سالها دادهٔ واقعی بکتست بگیرم. اینطوری دید بهتری داشتم که استراتژی معاملاتیم تو بازه ها و در رژیمهای کاملاً متفاوت بازار چطور عمل میکنه. یعنی تو سالهای رونددار، سالهای رنج و نوسانی، سالهای سقوط، سالهای آرام.
اینجا بود که انگار تصویر برام واضح شد.
استراتژیهایی که قبلاً یهو دیگه جواب نمیدادن و کار نمیکردن ، در اصل اصن هیچوقت استراتژی پایدار و خوبی نبودن و فقط تو یه دوره خاص انگار به صورت شانسی سود میدادن! اینو موقعی فهمیدم که وقتی اون استراتژی ها رو روی ۱۵ سال بک تست گرفتم. اون موقع بود که شخصیت واقعی اون استراتژی ها معلوم میشد!
دیگه به این نتیجه رسیدم که قبل از هر کاری ، اول اون ایده و استراتژی که به نظرم جذاب هست رو تبدیل کنم به ربات تا ببینم آیا واقعا سالهای زیادی دووم میاره؟ اگه دووم آورد اونموقع میرم سراغ بررسی عملکردش!
خلاصه مهمترین دستاورد این بود :
استراتژیای که در رژیمهای مختلف بازار تست نشده ، هنوز لبه واقعی نیست بلکه فقط یه حدس و گمانه که هنوز خود واقعیشو نشون نداده و میتونه پدرتو در بیاره! 😁
سالها استراتژیهام اینطوری بودن که یه مدتی خوب کار میکردن و بعد دیگه از کار میوفتادن و دیگه اون استراتژی جواب نمیداد! همه میگفتن طبیعیه ، بازارها که ثابت نیستن.. هر نوع استراتژیای رو روی هر نوع ابزاری تست کردم. نتیجه همیشه یکی از این سه چیز بود:
یا مستقیم ضرر میداد، یا یه مدت کوتاه خوب کار میکرد، یا توی بلند مدت میدیدی که سر به سر هستی ! نه سود خاصی کردی نه ضرر خاصی.
برای مدت طولانی واقعاً باور داشتم که هیچ استراتژیای توی بلندمدت کار نمیکند! تا اینکه تصمیم گرفتم که دیگه استراتژی معاملاتیم را دستی معامله نکنم، بلکه دقیقاً همانطور که دستی معامله میکردم، به کد تبدیلشون کنم و بعد روی سالها دادهٔ واقعی بکتست بگیرم. اینطوری دید بهتری داشتم که استراتژی معاملاتیم تو بازه ها و در رژیمهای کاملاً متفاوت بازار چطور عمل میکنه. یعنی تو سالهای رونددار، سالهای رنج و نوسانی، سالهای سقوط، سالهای آرام.
اینجا بود که انگار تصویر برام واضح شد.
استراتژیهایی که قبلاً یهو دیگه جواب نمیدادن و کار نمیکردن ، در اصل اصن هیچوقت استراتژی پایدار و خوبی نبودن و فقط تو یه دوره خاص انگار به صورت شانسی سود میدادن! اینو موقعی فهمیدم که وقتی اون استراتژی ها رو روی ۱۵ سال بک تست گرفتم. اون موقع بود که شخصیت واقعی اون استراتژی ها معلوم میشد!
دیگه به این نتیجه رسیدم که قبل از هر کاری ، اول اون ایده و استراتژی که به نظرم جذاب هست رو تبدیل کنم به ربات تا ببینم آیا واقعا سالهای زیادی دووم میاره؟ اگه دووم آورد اونموقع میرم سراغ بررسی عملکردش!
خلاصه مهمترین دستاورد این بود :
استراتژیای که در رژیمهای مختلف بازار تست نشده ، هنوز لبه واقعی نیست بلکه فقط یه حدس و گمانه که هنوز خود واقعیشو نشون نداده و میتونه پدرتو در بیاره! 😁
Davoud Mokhtari
New post 📝 :
"Why Uncorrelated Markets Cut Your Risk"
Most traders chase a better entry. Far fewer ask a question that matters more for survival: when one of my markets is bleeding, is everything else bleeding too? A short breakdown of the simple math behind diversification and why real, structural uncorrelation is the closest thing trading has to a free lunch.
https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/512327
"Why Uncorrelated Markets Cut Your Risk"
Most traders chase a better entry. Far fewer ask a question that matters more for survival: when one of my markets is bleeding, is everything else bleeding too? A short breakdown of the simple math behind diversification and why real, structural uncorrelation is the closest thing trading has to a free lunch.
https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/512327
Davoud Mokhtari
New post 📝 :
"Why Drawdown Matters More Than Profit"
After 10+ years trading markets, I've learned that the first number to check isn't the return, it's the drawdown you'd have to survive to earn it. A short, honest take on why the traders who last are the ones who found a drawdown they could hold onto.
https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/512325
"Why Drawdown Matters More Than Profit"
After 10+ years trading markets, I've learned that the first number to check isn't the return, it's the drawdown you'd have to survive to earn it. A short, honest take on why the traders who last are the ones who found a drawdown they could hold onto.
https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/512325
Davoud Mokhtari
출시돈 제품
GOLDEN MAWZOO — PROP FIRM EDITION Golden Mawzoo Prop Edition runs one proven trend engine across five uncorrelated markets — XAUUSD (Gold), GER40, NAS100, GBPJPY, and BTCUSD — on a single account, under one account-level risk governor. Built for prop-firm challenges and funded accounts, and it grows a personal account just as well. You attach it once, to a single Gold (XAUUSD) M1 chart — it trades all five markets from there. You do not load five charts. All figures below come from a historical
· 2
Davoud Mokhtari
출시돈 제품
Golden Mawzoo A disciplined, trend-following Expert Advisor for Gold (XAUUSD), built to last rather than to shine for one season and then blow up. It trades one position at a time with a protective stop attached from the moment the trade opens. No grid. No martingale. No averaging. No recovery loops. All figures below are historical backtest results on real tick data (2010 onward). Backtested and past performance does not guarantee future results. WHAT IT IS A single-market gold system with
· 2