Indicators: Fast ZigZag - page 5

New comment
 

So I'll look at your drawing.

Maybe on the left there is a visual error and I was wrong, but on the right it is unambiguous.

 
Karlson:

So I'll look at your drawing.

Maybe on the left there is a visual error and I was wrong, but on the right it is unambiguous.

1. the vertex/trough is shifted to the left, to the better value. You yourself suggested drawing it that way: - "...There will most likely ( should) be a defined low on the hairpin to the left.".

2. When you draw MA on AO, you should specify "apply to previous indicator data" in MA parameters.

 
Yurich:

1. the vertex/trough is shifted to the left, to the best value. You yourself suggested drawing it this way: - "...There will likely ( should) be a defined low on the hairpin to the left.".

2. When you draw MA on AO, you should specify "apply to previous indicator data" in MA parameters.


I got it, thank you. I will investigate it now.

There, when I wrote about the spike on the previous page, the spike is down (low), at this moment the AO is under the EMA. That's why it is correct.

 

Here's one disassembled plot.First applied vertical transition lines.Then manually looked at them high-low depending on the position of the AO-EMA.

 

Another drawing. In general, everything is correct. Thank you.

If you can make a version on the indicator code.

But in general everything is correct.

 
Karlson:

You can try it with the following fix:

       bool EnablePeek=ao[0]>ema[0];
       bool EnableTrough=ao[0]<ema[0];
       //---
       if(EnableTrough) if(low[i]<low[min]) min=i;
       if(EnablePeek) if(high[i]>high[max]) max=i;
 

Yep. Everything is more accurate and draws everywhere.

Except for my first drawing of the left element. Apparently there is a very small low.

Well done. Now it's a wave zigzag.

If I understand the code, I will try to modify it myself for AO_EMA.

I simplified it a bit today. There was one more senior EMA on the difference 63-165. It would correspond to the blue marking of the original drawing.

 
Karlson:

If I understand the code, I will try to modify it for AO_EMA.


You can connect your indicator via iCustom() in place of iAO and iMA, and take the value of ao from the zero buffer, the value of ema from the first buffer.

If you have any questions, I will help you.

 

I can and I did.

I just thought of embedding the code through regular iMAs. I get confused in indicators and bars.

Here's what I got. A lot of unnecessary stuff.

You should also refuse the parameter

Minimum points in a ray

It is kind of unnecessary, but it changes the picture.

Files:
ao_ema_ZZ_1c.mq5  3 kb
 
Karlson:

So I can and I did.


I got it wrong above, ao is the zero buffer, ema is the second buffer, the first buffer you have is the colour index.
1234567
New comment