Libraries: DaysOfWeekCheck - page 3

New comment
 

GODZILLA:

...And always amaze with their pre-modern understanding.....

Oh. added one word to my vocabulary...

Gentlemen, GODZILLA, Urain, komposter, you have done a lot for the MQL-community.... And many people are grateful to you for that... so don't scare newcomers with your squabbles.

 
Rosh:

I do not agree with this wording. The MQL5 language contains so much information that it is impossible to cover it with a couple of dozens of indicators or Expert Advisors. Each seeker finds something for him/herself, and it is not for nothing that we have integrated the search engine directly into the MetaTrader 5 editor.

Thanks to Nikolay and other percussionists, as you said, Code Base is filled with tutorial examples for beginners. Besides, he finds these codes on the web, rewrites them in MQL5 and does not forget to indicate the author. And this is not counting the huge amount of code he has written himself! What are digital filters alone worth? Who else has learnt so much about them and posted them here? Don't forget about it too, please.

It's just that Nikolai Kositsin makes a noticeably large contribution to Code base, and that's why he's in the limelight like no one else.

Nikolai Kositsin's merits are quite adequately assessed in his rating, and are not disputed by anyone.

I urge you to rate everything that is put out in public by the degree of importance. Everyone will have a subjective assessment, but that is the point.

Having read several hundred posts, having studied several dozens of codes of any of the participants of the community, everyone creates an opinion for himself whether it is worth (reading/studying) his creations.

As they say "keep your honour safe". If I have an opinion, then let Kositsin's code be the best, but I won't see it anymore, only because he (imho) riddled his codes with a lot of rubbish, and picking in it looking for something worthwhile is a waste of time, again (imho) for me.

I urge Nikolay to switch on the filter and put his vision to the public, with which some will agree and some will not. Perhaps even under a different nickname to separate the grain from the chaff.

But this way we see an omnivorous machine for translation to MQL5. If this is his position, then I have already formed my opinion on this position and even said it to my eyes.

 
denkir:

Gentlemen, GODZILLA, Urain, komposter, you have done a lot for the MQL-community.... And many people are grateful to you for that... so don't scare newcomers with your squabbles.

I support, I think the introduction of additional filter (marking) with division by level into something like: "elementary (for beginners)/advanced/complex" would solve a lot of problems at once. Finding what you need, and by level too, is sometimes quite a difficult task.
 
Urain:

Nikolai Kositsin's merits are quite adequately assessed in his rating, and are not disputed by anyone.

I call for everything that is put out in public to be assessed in terms of importance. Everyone will have a subjective assessment, but that is the point.

Having read several hundred posts, having studied several dozens of codes of any of the participants of the community, everyone creates for himself an opinion whether it is worth (reading/studying) his creations.

As they say "keep your honour safe". If I have an opinion, then let Kositsin's code be the best, but I won't see it anymore, only because he (imho) has littered his codes with a lot of rubbish, and picking in it looking for something worthwhile is a waste of time, again (imho) for me.

I urge Nikolay to switch on the filter and put his vision to the public, with which some will agree and some will not. Perhaps even under a different nickname to separate the grain from the chaff.

But this way we see an omnivorous machine for translation to MQL5. If this is his position, I have already formed my opinion to this position and even said it to my eyes.

The point is that, most likely, it would be more reasonable to divide the entire codebase into three partitions (by analogy with Debian Linux):

  1. The textbook section. Where perfectly written and optimised code variants that have become classics of the world genre would be presented.
  2. A stable solutions section. It would contain author's developments that would be perfectly written and optimised and would have a certain proven value and popularity. Moreover, a rather conservative selection logic should be applied to replenish the section.
  3. Experimental solutions section - for placing code of not the best writing quality and new and non-standard ideas. A more democratic logic of code placement should be used in this section.

About converting someone else's code under a different nickname - at first I had no other idea about it, but it was suggested to convert everything under my own nickname. That was the solution! Now it's hardly possible to change anything! The train has already left!

 
GODZILLA:

The point is that it was probably more reasonable to split the entire codebase into three partitions (similar to Debian Linux):

  1. The textbook section. This section would contain perfectly written and optimized code variants that have become classics of the world genre.
  2. A stable solutions section. The section would contain author's developments that would be perfectly written and optimised and would have a certain proven value and popularity. Moreover, a rather conservative selection logic should be applied to replenish the section.
  3. Experimental solutions section - for placing code of not the best writing quality and new and non-standard ideas. A more democratic logic of code placement should be used in this section.

About converting someone else's code under a different nickname - at first I had no other idea about it, but it was suggested to convert everything under my own nickname. That was the solution! Now it's hardly possible to change anything! The train's already left!

Good thinking.

As always, in a dispute the truth is born.

I made a statement of the problem (probably aggressively, but I apologise).

Rustam gave the direction of the solution.

You gave the solution.

That's why I love our forum.

123
New comment