Discussion of article "A Few Tips for First-Time Customers" - page 3

 
komposter:

No, no, no, I won't even try it ;)

Just sharing "life's madness".


What is the problem with just the indicator data values?

in essence the same if the line value is higher, the pixel

higher (if the angle of reference is taken from the bottom) ?

 
If it is an indicator, then -+++ and fuck it, if it lacks accuracy - add a cheeky, if it wants to count pixels, then in principle it is not a big problem to recalculate the price into pixels, paint the indyuk in some bright acid colour, and then GetPixel()e to calculate it.
 
FAQ:
If it is an indicator, then -+++ and fuck it, if it lacks precision - add a cheeky, if it wants to count pixels, then in principle it is not a big problem to recalculate the price into pixels, paint the indicator in some bright acid colour, and then GetPixel()e to calculate it.


The point here is that it's a load of bollocks and it doesn't make sense.

What's the point of counting pixels if

it's clear to a nerd that the higher the value of the pixel.

the higher the value of the indicator.


And it's not a fact - if the window is compressed (in the terminal).

then all the pixels will change because the anchor point must be located

in the chart window. Even if it is not in it

then when the window position is changed, the same thing will happen - it makes no sense at all. :-)

Документация по MQL5: Стандартные константы, перечисления и структуры / Константы объектов / Способы привязки объектов
Документация по MQL5: Стандартные константы, перечисления и структуры / Константы объектов / Способы привязки объектов
  • www.mql5.com
Стандартные константы, перечисления и структуры / Константы объектов / Способы привязки объектов - Документация по MQL5
 
Im_hungry doesn't make any sense. :-)
And I do not deny that abracadabra. But if the client is insistent in asking, then you can get round it like this, warning that he is responsible for the consequences. well, and the price by piling up 2-3 times, so he will immediately have no desire.
 
FAQ:
I don't deny that it's abracadabra. But if the client persistently asks, it is possible to get round like this, warning that he is responsible for the consequences. Well, and the price is piled up in 2-3 times, so he will immediately have no desire.


Good method :-)

 
Im_hungry:

What's wrong with the indicator data values?

is essentially the same, if the line value is higher, the pixel is higher (if the binding angle is taken from the bottom) ?

Because they cannot be obtained between bars.
 
FAQ:
If he wants to count pixels, then in principle it is not a big problem to recalculate the price into pixels, paint the indium in some acidic colour, and then GetPixel()e it to calculate it.

What's the point? So that at the slightest change of size, scale or position of the window everything moves to new places?

The idea itself is delusional.

 
Delusional is a very mild way of putting it.
 
FAQ:
Delusional is an understatement.


Well, life happens. :-)

 
Here's another Sad story