You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
No, no, no, I won't even try it ;)
Just sharing "life's madness".
What is the problem with just the indicator data values?
in essence the same if the line value is higher, the pixel
higher (if the angle of reference is taken from the bottom) ?
If it is an indicator, then -+++ and fuck it, if it lacks precision - add a cheeky, if it wants to count pixels, then in principle it is not a big problem to recalculate the price into pixels, paint the indicator in some bright acid colour, and then GetPixel()e to calculate it.
The point here is that it's a load of bollocks and it doesn't make sense.
What's the point of counting pixels if
it's clear to a nerd that the higher the value of the pixel.
the higher the value of the indicator.
And it's not a fact - if the window is compressed (in the terminal).
then all the pixels will change because the anchor point must be located
in the chart window. Even if it is not in it
then when the window position is changed, the same thing will happen - it makes no sense at all. :-)
I don't deny that it's abracadabra. But if the client persistently asks, it is possible to get round like this, warning that he is responsible for the consequences. Well, and the price is piled up in 2-3 times, so he will immediately have no desire.
Good method :-)
What's wrong with the indicator data values?
is essentially the same, if the line value is higher, the pixel is higher (if the binding angle is taken from the bottom) ?
If he wants to count pixels, then in principle it is not a big problem to recalculate the price into pixels, paint the indium in some acidic colour, and then GetPixel()e it to calculate it.
What's the point? So that at the slightest change of size, scale or position of the window everything moves to new places?
The idea itself is delusional.
Delusional is an understatement.
Well, life happens. :-)