You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Thanks for your supporto Michael could you please link me in pvt a valid and actual mini PC for my purposes?
Venus UM790 Pro Mini PC AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS up to 5.2 GHz 32 GB DDR5 512GB SSD with AMD Radeon 780M
A little over $1,000 for this configuration in one of the Ukrainian online stores, but with a 1024 GB SSD. Sounds attractive; I thought it would cost more.
[edit] At the same time, purchasing 128 GB of DDR5 RAM here would cost around $2,000.
[edit] At the same time, purchasing 128 GB of DDR5 RAM here would cost around $2,000.
OUCH.
mine was 524 aud, and is now 464 AUD
(Crucial CT2K64G56C46S5 DDR5 RAM 128GB Kit (2x64GB) 5600MHz SODIMM CL46)
(Crucial CT2K64G56C46S5 DDR5 RAM 128GB Kit (2x64GB) 5600MHz SODIMM CL46)
yeah i think the 464 maybe wrong or old info. see this search... prices in AUD
i obviously got mine before the world-price-hike.
Hi guys, I'm about to buy a new PC to speed up both trading and strategy testing, since mine currently takes several hours to complete a year's worth of tests. Do you think it's better to prioritize the graphics or the processor, which should be the latest generation? Do you also recommend a laptop with all the limitations of a small screen or a desktop PC? Thanks for your replies.
Check out gaming tower pc's. Gaming is really burdensome on hardware, so I bought an i7 gaming pc years ago. MT5 and its Tester are still running strong on it.
As an added bonus, my tower unit has multilayer serviceable dust screens and 4 cooling fans. I use a furnace cleaning kit (micro-vac) to keep it clean.
as for ddr4. i cant even find a stick of 64gb ddr4 so dimm, but a 2 stick kit of 32gb sticks ie 64gb total is also rediculously higher than i expected. $400 - as high as $800 AUD rediculous!
Here is the bottleneck: MetaTrader’s Strategy Tester runs single-pass tests on a single thread, meaning performance depends entirely on single-core clock speed. While optimizations can utilize multiple threads, they are still hampered by the per-core frequency.
I recently considered renting an AMD EPYC 9754 (128 cores / 256 threads) out of frustration, only to realize the paradox: these server-grade CPUs often have lower base clocks (around 2.25 GHz) compared to high-end consumer chips that hit 6 GHz.
In short: more threads, but slower execution per pass.
Careful with those mini PCs, they're prone to overheating.