You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Good EA won't trade martingale or grid. It opens trade with TP/SL with a proper risk control. Last but not least, it trades a profitable strategy that provide the high winning rate.
I completely agree with you. Indeed, a good trading advisor will never be based on the Martingale method or a grid strategy.
Regarding Martingale, I 100% agree.
Grid is a bit of broad term. At the end of the day, a grid is merely horizontal, vertical, or both horizontal and vertical lines on a chart. A bipolarly opposite EA to Martingale is Anti-Martingale. This too is based on a horizontal grid. It also has a bipolarly opposite value because it stacks trades floating in profit. Alternatively known as pyramiding--because the contract/lot size traded is progressively reduced rather than multiplied. As a caveat, a large amount is starting capital is required in order to trade it.
Regarding Martingale, I 100% agree.
Grid is a bit of broad term. At the end of the day, a grid is merely horizontal, vertical, or both horizontal and vertical lines on a chart. A bipolarly opposite EA to Martingale is Anti-Martingale. This too is based on a horizontal grid. It also has a bipolarly opposite value because it stacks trades floating in profit. Alternatively known as pyramiding--because the contract/lot size traded is progressively reduced rather than multiplied. As a caveat, a large amount is starting capital is required in order to trade it.
I written a code based on OP idea and trade history. This code is just assumption.
Hello, Ryan. I agree. In my opinion, if you add a grid to a good trend-following EA, you'll likely end up with a good robot. But to do that, I think you first need to create a good trend-following EA.
One would certainly tend to think so, including me, but after I added ATR, MA, and MA crossover filters to an Anti-Martingale EA, that proved counterproductive.
To be clear, I used a stepped levels indicator--the sequential steps of which you could say determine directional bias. Those steps are best used alone.
One would certainly tend to think so, including me, but after I added ATR, MA, and MA crossover filters to an Anti-Martingale EA, that proved counterproductive.
To be clear, I used a stepped levels indicator--the sequential steps of which you could say determine directional bias. Those steps are best used alone.
At first glance, ATR and MA seem mathematically sound, but I'm skeptical of them. I generally assume that we know what was and what is currently happening, but we don't know what will happen in 1 second, 1 minute, 1 day, and so on. That's the market. Therefore, I try to base my strategy on knowledge of history and the current situation. Assumptions about what might happen in 1 second based on all sorts of theories are too much of a luxury, which in trading leads to big losses. Therefore, I'm trying to develop my own theory based on mathematical methods. How I'll succeed, I can't say. Time will tell.
Hi Anatolii,
Based on my own limited experience, but having worked as a programmer, I agree with you.
It's the randomness of the incoming ticks I find hard to program, even in a downtrend you can get a small uptrend which can trigger a stop loss, increasing the stop loss is pointless.
You end up with a reactive program which can't handle all conditions.
I think you are right in looking at trying to find a method of predicting the overall trend using math.
What I miss is having a database you can select and process, that's where my expertise was.
It's interesting though, keeps me busy.
regerds
Mike
Hi Anatolii,
Based on my own limited experience, but having worked as a programmer, I agree with you.
It's the randomness of the incoming ticks I find hard to program, even in a downtrend you can get a small uptrend which can trigger a stop loss, increasing the stop loss is pointless.
You end up with a reactive program which can't handle all conditions.
I think you are right in looking at trying to find a method of predicting the overall trend using math.
What I miss is having a database you can select and process, that's where my expertise was.
It's interesting though, keeps me busy.
regerds
Mike
Hi, Mike. I sincerely wish you and me success. Indeed, in my opinion, robotics lacks mathematics and relies heavily on pure programming and computational work, which requires significant computing resources. And resources are always limited. Sooner or later, we'll reach a dead end. It's logical to assume that the future of artificial intelligence lies in constructing mathematical objects, not in mindlessly building networks.
It is all random, for retail traders you are at the mercy of banks etc , the whole retail space was developed to get a collective of mugs and take their cash .The act should be random the management of it should be math based and law of avg and then with patience and discipline you can grind a profit . My biggest winners were all random and the emotional disengage is a revelation .