You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
A specialist, in short....
It's the local philasopher
That's your personal opinion. By the way, talk to me directly.
Why be rude?))
I decided to keep silent that your previous answer was completely copied from the article in your link.))) Learn to think for yourself.
? Not copied, but quoted and given the original source. Copypasted is if the original source is not cited.
Sounds like copypasta to me. What do you think?
That's your personal opinion. By the way, talk to me directly.
Sensei says
Let's talk about space. Go ahead.
Sounds like pure copypaste to me. What do you think?
It's rubbish.
Let's talk about space. Go ahead.
Researchers argue that generative AI tools can produce low-quality answers to user queries because their models are trained on "synthetic data" rather than the unique human content that makes their answers special.
Other AI researchers have coined their own terms to describe this learning method. In a study published in July, researchers from Stanford and Rice universities called it "Model Autograph Syndrome," in which an AI's "self-absorbed" cycle of learning content created by other AIs can cause generative AI tools to be "doomed" to degrade the "quality" and "diversity" of the images and text they create
Jathan Sadowski, a senior researcher at the Emerging Technologies Research Laboratory in Australia who studies AI, has labelled this phenomenon "Habsburg AI", arguing that systems trained on the output of other generative AI tools can create "mutilated response mutations".
While the specific implications of these phenomena remain unclear, some technology experts believe that "model collapse" can make it difficult to determine the original source of the information on which an AI model is trained. As a result, providers of accurate information, such as the media, may decide to restrict their content to prevent it from being used to train AI. Ray Wang, CEO of technology research firm Constellation Research, suggested in an essay that this could give rise to an "era of public information darkness."
The researchers argue that generative AI tools can produce low-quality answers to user queries because their models are trained on "synthetic data" rather than the unique human content that makes their answers special.
Other AI researchers have coined their own terms to describe this learning method. In a study published in July, researchers from Stanford and Rice universities called it the "Model Autograph Syndrome," in which an AI's "self-absorbed" cycle of learning content created by other AIs can cause generative AI tools to be "doomed" to degrade the "quality" and "diversity" of the images and text they create
Jathan Sadowski, a senior researcher at the Emerging Technologies Research Laboratory in Australia who studies AI, has labelled this phenomenon "Habsburg AI", arguing that systems trained on the output of other generative AI tools can create "mutilated mutations of responses".
While the specific implications of these phenomena remain unclear, some technology experts believe that "model collapse" can make it difficult to determine the original source of the information on which an AI model is trained. As a result, providers of accurate information, such as the media, may decide to restrict their content to prevent it from being used to train AI. Ray Wang, CEO of technology research firm Constellation Research, suggested in an essay that this could give rise to an "era of public information darkness."
Understandable. Logical. Reasonable. The more actively this AI develops, the faster it will choke on its own....