Discussion of article "The price movement model and its main provisions (Part 2): Probabilistic price field evolution equation and the occurrence of the observed random walk" - page 6

 
Aleksey Ivanov #:
Although, on the other hand, the energy levels, which I wrote about here and on which the price is "dumped", are just another expression of such attractors.

Perhaps someone will find it useful.

https://disk.yandex.ru/i/6maEvrueD2GteA

 
Aleksey Ivanov #:
Although, on the other hand, the energy levels, which I have written about here and on which the price "collapses", are just another expression of such attractors.

The attractor, perhaps, could be called Elliott waves, on which the price falls, and energy levels are fragments of these waves.

 
Inquiring #:

Maybe someone could use it.

https://disk.yandex.ru/i/6maEvrueD2GteA

Yes, not a bad book, the material is brief and quite simple.
 
Inquiring #:

Perhaps someone could use it.

https://disk.yandex.ru/i/6maEvrueD2GteA

My favourite book)))) I started learning science with it in 2018. By the way, I posted an excerpt from it earlier.
 
Aleksey Ivanov #:

One of my acquaintances, Vasya Yakimkim, known as an advanced trader , told me about these attractors twenty years ago. Then he wrote a book " Forex : How to Make Big Money " and even became a government advisor on relevant investments in some institute under the President. So this Vasya did not mention attractors in his book, apparently disappointed in the prospects of this approach. However, these are my assumptions.


If you use mashki, you will not be disappointed, you just need time for learning and comprehension. Many people do not believe in them at all. And you should.
 
Inquiring #:

What's your idea of reality? The random tossing of atoms in the void? Or some kind of personal realisation of the world around you?

Reality is explored by physics. That's where your ideas come from.)
 
spiderman8811 #:
If you use mashki, you won't be disappointed, it just takes time to learn and understand. A lot of people don't believe in them at all. You should.
Many don't not believe, they don't know;) The average (in matstatistics), which is often incorrectly called mathematical expectation, is (with some confidence interval) the best price forecast for tomorrow. So mashki is a good tool. It's just a matter of averaging depth and confidence interval, i.e. channel width, in a simple way:)
 
Mikhail Tkachev #:
Reality is explored by physics. That's where the ideas come from)

Physics does not explore the psyche. By your logic, the psyche is not real? Or should it not be considered at all? And you consider yourself just a body, a body?

 
Mikhail Tkachev #:
Many people do not not believe, they do not know;) The average (in matstatistics), which is often incorrectly called mathematical expectation, is (with some confidence interval) the best price forecast for tomorrow. So mashki is a good tool. It's a matter of little, the depth of averaging and the confidence interval, i.e. channel width, in simple terms:)

Wikipedia: Mathematical expectation is a concept inprobability theory meaning theaverage ( weighted by the probabilities of possible values) value ofa random variable.

Share the secret of how to determine the averaging period and channel width correctly, it is such a trifle for you.

 
Mikhail Tkachev #:
The mean (in matstatistics), which is often incorrectly called mathematical expectation, is (with some confidence interval) the best forecast of the price for tomorrow.

This is true only under certain conditions (independence and equal distribution, for example), which are obviously not fulfilled for real prices.