How is the viability of a trade idea determined? - page 9
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Don't be ridiculous...
One losing trade will have no effect on the overall profit, even if it is force majeure...
A competent trader always has several options for closing a position, including the occurrence of force majeure...
The arithmetic is different - any losing trade reduces the total profit, and any profitable trade increases it. Although who knows, a "competent" trader might have it differently.)))
The strategy is break-even, so there is no other plan than to wait for profit!
You're the one who started to cheat when it was pointed out to you.
You are the one who started to cheat...
If you really looked at the reports, you would have seen that every trade has a stop-loss, which is a protection against force majeure...
Even if the stop had been triggered by force majeure, the total profit would have remained in the plus...
But you are not interested in such a strategy... Your task is to find inconsistencies in your reasoning, despite the results...
It is relatively easy to determine the viability of a trading idea in 2 steps:
1. it does not work on an entirely arbitrary chart. That is, it depends on specific instruments, timeframes and the current momentum.
Transferring it to another instrument (or set of instruments) is extremely difficult and close to a fiasco.
Adapting to other timeframes (the favourite one here is the smaller frame, trading more often) is not possible at all.
On a distant history, a fresh idea is unworkable and the robot will "drain" on it
2. If everything is OK with p1, the idea should be published here. By the composition of the haters and interested parties, you can clearly see if the game is worth it :-)
Arithmetic says otherwise - any losing trade reduces the overall profit and any profitable trade increases it.)))
Don't twist it... We were talking about a margin call after one transaction...
Whatever you're talking about, be precise, then you'll be understood correctly. The Russian language is rich and powerful).
It is relatively easy to determine the viability of a trading idea in 2 steps:
1. it does not work on an entirely arbitrary chart. That is, it depends on specific instruments, timeframes and the current momentum.
Transferring it to another instrument (or set of instruments) is extremely difficult and close to a fiasco.
Adapting to other timeframes (the favourite one here is the smaller frame, trading more often) is not possible at all.
On a distant history, a fresh idea is unworkable and the robot will "drain" on it
2. If everything is OK with p1, the idea should be published here. By the makeup of haters and interested parties, you can clearly see if the game is worth the effort :-)
All this is interesting...
You've identified the bottlenecks of your strategy...
So what prevents you from developing a strategy that takes into account all the points voiced...?
lack of KNOWLEDGE? ... So you have to learn!
Whatever you're talking about, be precise, then you'll be understood correctly. The Russian language is rich and powerful).
All this is interesting...
You have identified the bottlenecks of your strategy...
So what's stopping you from developing a strategy that takes into account all the points you've made...?
You don't have the knowledge? You need to learn.
You have psychic powers. You know who has and has not developed what.
You have psychic powers. You know who has and has not developed what.
It is relatively easy to determine the viability of a trading idea in 2 steps:
1. it does not work on an entirely arbitrary chart. That is, it depends on specific instruments, timeframes and the current momentum.
Transferring it to another instrument (or set of instruments) is extremely difficult and close to a fiasco.
Adapting to other timeframes (the favourite one here is the smaller frame, trading more often) is not possible at all.
On a distant history, a fresh idea is unworkable and the robot will "drain" on it
2. If everything is OK with p1, the idea should be published here. By composition of followers and interested persons, you can clearly see if the game is worth it :-)
I wonder if, purely theoretically, it's realistic to develop a system that can work on an entirely arbitrary graph? Perhaps mathematicians must have an answer to such a question.
Almost all traders try to test systems on quotes that are as accurate as possible. Has anyone has tried to deliberately generate an extremely inconvenient for the system chart and make it hang around zero on it?