Looking for patterns - page 206
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Unsolicited: guys, we are talking about patterns here, not about trading tactics and even less about the results. In my opinion, even statistics is on the verge of a foul, because it allows you to assess the result of a particular pattern, but is rarely able to identify it, although it happens if you apply normal logic in processing its results.
Statistics cannot be calculated simply in terms of entry points, the market does not walk on lines, the market walks in channels that continually change. I have not seen a single person who earned stably with the help of entry points.
Unfortunately, even entry points are difficult to determine, let alone any points...
So only groups of events, only zones, as I call them "operational areas" or "decision-making zones".
Genghis, you are thinking "from the level", I like to trade "on the upside" when I have already checked the entry condition. That's why you have the entry area and I have the breakout point.
Why did you self-delete? Do you consider yourself superfluous here?
Dschinghiz, you are thinking of trading "from the level", I prefer trading "on the run", when I have already checked the entry condition. That's why you have the entry area and I have the breakout point.
Why did you self-delete? Do you consider yourself superfluous here?
Not exactly from the level... but you're right anyway. I can trade both, but the stops are smaller in the zones; it better suits me.
The only thing I would do is to discuss some conceptual nuances and subtleties that are fundamentally different, like now)
Why should I argue about trends and flotsam, why should I argue about randomness when I already know exactly what's what. It's just a question of using what I've found intelligently, and more importantly in the original question, whether it's possible to use it (anything) in principle.breakout point.
By the way, in my practice you either trade on absorption or breakout of the nearest extremum, these are the only two events that actually make any sense.
But in the first case you have a large stop, in the second you have a high frequency of stop motion...
Like you:
if case 1: reasonablyreduce stops
if case 2: avoid high frequency of foot hit
I'm guessing of course, but I'm just interested in your point of view.
Sincerely Che :)
not exactly from the level... But you're right anyway. I can trade both ways, like you. but in the zones the stops are smaller) it suits me better) although sometimes I have to wait half a week for a group of signals.
When I've got the mottootto in mind I've got a good feel for the future, but I've got a good feel for the future.)
Why should I argue about trends and flotsam and why should I argue about randomness when I already know exactly what's what. It's just a question of using what I've found intelligently, and more importantly in the original question, whether it's possible to use it (anything) in principle.Genghis, I do not want to take the contents of my brain to the grave. I've already given my daughter everything, or almost everything. She makes up to 100% a month, with an average of 40-50. Not on forex, but on the stock market, without taking much risk.
Why not share with the others?
Why not share with the others?
What's the point?
It's all turning into flooding and a bunch of unfounded hypotheses anyway.
I just don't want to waste time on nonsense... And given my intensity of developing strategies on the same laws few people can really work like this.
When you start earning money you become too lazy to even write - because everything works anyway).
I work with facts, like you, while most people here work with theory and hypotheses. Unfortunately I'm in complete agreement with you -"I don't want to carry the contents of my brain to the grave")
What's the point?
It's all turning into a lot of flub and a lot of unfounded hypotheses anyway.
I just don't want to waste time on nonsense... And given my intensity of developing strategies on the same laws few people can really work like this.
When you start earning money you become too lazy to even write - because everything works anyway).
I'm working with facts like you, while most people here work with theory and hypotheses. Unfortunately I'm in complete agreement with you -"I don't want to carry the contents of my brain to the grave")))
Why not? What if the current retard becomes a genius?
Why not? What if the current moron becomes a genius?
why not ... just a couple of centuries of discussions, predictions, grails, reptiloid exposés and you're done)