You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
- Steve Jobs
...
If the system is a parameter list, then instead of a relational database we get a meaningless and incoherent heap of tables. The approach is wrong.
Guys, come on, no illusions.
One guy is going to write a new studio, based on his experience in creating four objects, but has not thought through compilation and debugging.
Another one is going to create a new high-level language, without understanding the complexity of multi-level logical problems.
I'm shocked... What gave rise to this topic's name? From a lack of understanding?
There are often headlines predicting the end of the programming era. They say that AI and neural networks won't stand a chance against humans. I used to mockingly read such articles, but now I am not laughing. After all, Objects (which OOP creates) consist of parameters, like bodies of particles, and are connected by links. Parameters and links do not have to be described in code, especially - in different languages. They can be assembled in the studio with a set of visual tools and any program can be written that way. I wonder why the development didn't go this way...
Who will program these very AI and neural networks then?
And how's that going?
High-level programming? Do you want to come up with your own? Is logic all right? How quickly can you write code without errors with if then at least up to ten levels of nesting? That's where the ability to convert the TOR into a ready-made Expert Advisor will come from. And what if you make mistakes with your "perfect logic"? How to perform debugging?
Who cares if it's a voice or some other organ.
Who will then program these very AI and neural networks?
First the people, then, they themselves.)
I don't think that will be possible in the near future.
Don't confuse programming and software development. Programmers died out a long time ago. The developer army is only growing, because it's not silly clicking the keys, throwing shapes and patterns on a GUI.
And it's always business as usual for cheap resources. An AI creating a calculator will cost significantly more than the resources of the developer of that calculator, so the author's original question is more hypothetical than real.
The complexity of the products also varies greatly. For example, until someone creates an AI that can create something like ZCach with zkSNARKs, many years will pass, during which time even more complex algorithms will have been invented.