From practice to theory and back to practice - page 41
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The Dreamer never lies (except in the case of the most obvious trolling, if he says dead is dead, if to the factory is to the factory)
My fault, I was just quoting as usual, you should have ended the narrative about the factory and it would have been the same as always
my bad, I was just quoting as usual, I should have ended the story about the plant and it would have been the same as always
the plant isn't as scary as it looks, it's fine
By the way today it turned out there is a plant or rather a group of chemical plants called New Hope
it's not as scary in the factory as it may seem all right
once you've been in the factory for a while I might even think about not letting that exhortation pass my ears
oh by the way missed this post........
there was a spillover theory that is in fact deeply flawed because the correlation between a declining currency and a rising one is always different
even if we miraculously get to see all the volumes in the bank forex, even then there will be a non-linear relationship
it's not about the hard correlation of cross rates but about the size of the movements
although in a moment, of course, there is always a "funding currency" through which capital flows into the target currency and it will of course be affected.
but you can't predict the size of the movement.
there was a topic about forming a set of linear equations by currency pairs with matrix 4*4 and each equation represented a plane in 4-dimensional space
I do not remember what was in the right part, but most likely a constant-shift (like a free term in the regression)
but in the end it turns out to be an extremely stupid trade - to wait until it returns to the conditional "centre" after the deviation
but you may as well just trade an arbitrary return portfolio
(which makes sense under the right conditions, even without matrices)
an error seems to have been found in the mechanism of profit calculation in MT4 and if one opens a mega portfolio and quickly closes it, one may gain profit out of thin air
I don't know where the profit is calculated and I am not sure if it is a market trade or not.
I do not know who takes profits where). One thing I do know is that currencies are interlinked and cannot move much away from the centre of gravity.
In the figure in the white oval the currencies are shown. They clearly characterise and control the behaviour of pairs.
Such a system can give 20% a day. Why go to a factory when you can buy one))
I don't know who overflows where). One thing I do know is that currencies are interlinked and cannot move much away from the centre of gravity.
The white oval in the figure shows the currencies. They clearly characterise and control the behaviour of pairs.
Such a system can give 20% a day. Why go to a factory when you can buy one))
What is taken as the centre of gravity?
A little late, but I think the author is talking about MAE\MFE analysis and optimisation. At least at the beginning of the thread in the first 4 pages.
What is taken as the centre of gravity?
Zero.
Such a system may give 20% a day.
Or it may not. Or it could be -20% a day.
Are you trying to make a graalist out of yourself again so that people will come to your profile and buy your products? And you have never traded anywhere else but on the demo.
He will buy the factory, pensioner, on his pension! )))