Question! Do the developers of robots (Expert Advisors) trade themselves? - page 18

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I am sitting here and thinking, not so long ago I had a conversation with one of the developers of robots (Expert Advisors), he told me that he has the best and most advanced robot and says it brings a lot of money, so I asked him why do not you trade? I asked him, why don't you trade? The answer killed me: I only develop them...., HOW can he develop a decent robot if he does not trade himself????????
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Myrobot has been running for 3-4 months on a demo and shows everything OK. But as soon as I switch toa real account, it starts hiccuping, then the spread does not take into account the commission, then the swap, then it opens without any clue. I have a question in the market 100500 robots, are there any tests on real accounts? More precisely, it's not even so. In the market that would add a robot it should be run in parallel on a real account. I think there would not even be 10 pieces left))))
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I will add at least was run on a demo account in parallel to be able to see the statistics in real time - already get at least some indication of reality
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Actually very interesting conclusions.
I have drawn some conclusions: 99% of rubbish in the Market consists of Expert Advisors.
I think that there are good programmers who make robots at trader's request but they do not understand anything about trading))), hence the robots suck in my opinion only.
I think that only my point of view is that they do not understand trading robots and that's why they suck.
I don't think so, but I do think that the robot is a good one and I am sure I will get to know it.
There are those who make 100500 robots a day and earn money on it, well this business everyone understands, just belong to the group of 99%.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I come to the shop to buy a TV set with android, a salesman comes up, I ask him what android, what memory, what matrix, response time, and he gives me 3 out of 5 answers. But the manager is not a manufacturer, he needs to know what he is selling and how it fucking works,
we have two system administrators, one can work with the 1C database and the other can't, they are both written in the same language, the same code, but no! One of them doesn't have enough traction.
i come to the most known one in the city (before that i visited 5-7 same reply), cooler doesn't freeze, says it bleeds from under the nut (threads are out and he cannot make them, he cannot weld them with argon) and the nut is near the wall with the body, says to take off the front panel and replace the pipe. Tube is there? No answer, well what does it cost 10 thousand to remove the panel, 3000 filling. went to look for a tube in shops no, then an acquaintance met, said try to argon to come, drove up, prompted a very unknown shop, came to some garage, came out a guy looked, said after 20 minutes would be ready while across the street went to the ATM, he did everything, gave 2500 for everything, including the fueling.
So you and experts in some areas, and a little step to the side so they do not know and do not know how, and even the brain does not work as it is possible to fix or create. It's a long time since I did so much typing)))).
I don't know what to do with it, I'd rather ask a question and say goodbye or badbye.
the script does not work (i.e. it reads from the stats in htm format and not from the terminal history)
The terminal history can be transferred to the chart with the mouse holding the shifter.
I am sitting and thinking, not so long ago I had a conversation with one of the developers of robots (Expert Advisors), he tells me that he has the most awesome and advanced robot and says that it brings a lot of money, so I asked him why do not you trade yourself? I killed the answer: I only develop them...., HOW can he develop a decent robot if he does not trade himself????????
Personally, I am and will be trading. Initially I created programmes for myself.
The terminal history can be transferred to the chart with the mouse on the shifter.
With a mouse!
She'll pick it up and brew it
A mouse!
And he'll pick it up and he'll brew it.
I save this file on my desktop, load it as a pointer into a script, and I put it on a chart.
and i have made deals there some time ago and i'm really lazy to search through html file via Ctrl+F and then enter the filter by history and drag this deal to a chart (every deal!)
I guess we didn't understand each other
2019.01.26 12:41:05.192 Script Statement2Chart AUDUSD,Weekly: removed
2019.01.26 12:41:05.187 Statement2Chart AUDUSD,Weekly: uninit reason 0
2019.01.26 12:41:05.187 Statement2Chart AUDUSD,Weekly: Statement File DetailedStatement.htm Not found!!! Please check his!
2019.01.26 12:41:05.187 Statement2Chart AUDUSD,Weekly: initialized
2019.01.26 12:41:05.160 Statement2Chart AUDUSD,Weekly inputs: StatementFilename=DetailedStatement.htm; DeleteThisGraphicsFromChart=false; shift_hours=2;
"Perceived profitability" of the EA was also greatly exaggerated)))
I really don't understand what I need, to transfer all trades to a chart or one at a time? Or selectively? Need to clarify.
The "perceived profitability" of the EA has also been greatly exaggerated))))
What I really don't understand, do I need to transfer all trades to the chart or one at a time? Or selectively? I need to clarify.