ZigZags Shepherds - page 21

New comment
 
Олег avtomat:

Does that still surprise you? That's the atmosphere of this commune... for a long time... and has not developed by itself, but is deliberately maintained by an "invisible hand" here.

I personally do not like this atmosphere, but I do not write the charter in this monastery.


zy.

I do not use ZZ.

I have ZZ is the main in TC. I created it from scratch on a completely different principle from the classic ones. It has only one parameter and it works in a wide price range. I have not used polyline, and directly labeled vertexes with coordinates for program interaction. A wave structure (not Elliott) associated with patterns is formed based on indications of ZZ that gives an idea about the current state of the market and intentions. On the basis of the waves we can build the TS with a high probability of a positive result. The waves alternate, and even more so)) Elliott did not even suspect that.

 
Uladzimir Izerski:

The wave structure (not Elliott's) connected into patterns is formed on the basis of EZ readings, which gives an idea of the current state of the market and intentions.

I agree, only evaluation of the current state of the market can theoretically give at least some positive MO...

All other probabilistic methods are scooping water with a sieve.))

 
Novaja:
Pastuhov developed a method for interpreting price charts, he identified the statistical regularities, and his work deserves respect due to this.
As for the trend following and counter-trending methods, there is a principle of using "tails", the profit in this case depends very much on the spread value. The same principle of "tails" is used in channel strategies, maybe it works for stock market, but not for forex.

The difficulty is that you use an instrument with defects... I understand that you can achieve some success with a bad instrument, but methodologically it is not right. First, you need to find a good instrument, and only then go on with the method...

But this is your business, I will not interfere...

 
Serqey Nikitin:

First you need to find a good tool, and only then deal with the methodology...

It's probably more the other way round. ))

 
Andrei:

It's probably the other way round. ))

Yes, maybe... First you should think up some techniques and then try to create an instrument for them... if you succeed...
 
Andrei:

I agree, only an assessment of the current state of the market can theoretically give any positive MOI...

All other probabilistic methods are scooping water with a sieve.)

There are decent fish in the water.))

 
Uladzimir Izerski:

There are decent fish in the water))

Well, maybe there's enough for a soup in a cauldron, but no more. ))
 
Novaja:
Yes, I agree, but you can identify statistical patterns that will help
They will help you in volatility trading. But when trading to buy or sell, distribution patterns are useless.
 

Guys, the promised video will be a little later - no time at all

Files:
IMG_1693.JPG  1361 kb
1...1415161718192021
New comment