From theory to practice - page 671
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
No, that's it, Gianni - I'm reading Gunn and I don't want to be distracted. Sorry.
Alexander, come back from nirvana with Gunn, what are you leaving us sufferers for?)
Alexander, come back from nirvana with Gan, what are you leaving us sufferers for?))
Somewhere on some website I read the phrase - "Those who leave to study Ghana disappear forever!"
I'm afraid Alexander won't be coming back.)
You will laugh, but my trading is based precisely on time. Price is used indirectly. By the way, I am not an expert in distributions and, in general, I am Alexei.
Sorry, there's been a mix-up. Alexander_K should certainly be considered the distribution specialist in this thread. I asked him a question and he also gave me a rather lengthy "no answer" https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/221552/page665#comment_9065643.
Please do not hesitate to contact me.
Well, maybe it's just me, but that's more likely to be the case. It follows - why bother counting the sum of the increments if it's quicker than the difference.
Well, finally)). Page 671. Now they're going to invent the Momentum indicator.)
Wrote, could not stand, although I promised not to write in this thread.
That's it. I'm off.
I could be wrong, at least what I have seen in the calculations is that the sum of price increments over N bars equals the same difference between the two prices of that period.
That is the increments for 1440 minutes = Price 0 - Price 1440.
Well, maybe I got such a plot, but it is more likely to be so. It follows - but why count the sum of increments if it is faster than the difference.
As far as I understand, Alexander always had abs(return), not just return, and the sum of abs(return) is not equal to the difference of rates at all.
I could be wrong, at least what I have seen in the calculations is that the sum of price increments over N bars equals the same difference between the two prices of that period.
That is the increments in 1440 minutes = Price 0 - Price 1440.
Well maybe that's the plot I got, but more likely it is. It follows - and why bother counting the sum of increments if it's quicker than the difference.
The invention and justification of momentum, it should be noted. Just a little bit left and straight into heaven.
That's right. That's how the market works - from chaos to self-organisation and back again. Calculating the moment of transition is incredibly difficult, but it is possible.
I remain with my deepest conviction that the magic key is non-entropy/entropy. I just can't figure it out :)) I'm getting incredibly stupid here. I've fallen into the arms of the local underdogs and retards...
Bad dancer...
I could be wrong, at least what I have seen in the calculations is that the sum of price increments over N bars equals the same difference between the two prices of that period.
That is, increments over 1440 minutes = Price 0 - Price 1440.
Well, maybe it's the plot I've got, but that's more likely. It follows - but why count the sum of increments if it's faster than the difference.
well, thank goodness...