From theory to practice - page 450

 
Evgeniy Chumakov:
I used to think you should think before you do. Not the other way round, do first and then think about what you've done.

Did you honestly answer that you have never traded? That's important!

 
Uladzimir Izerski:

Did you honestly answer that you have never traded? This is important!


Never, and never on this system are different concepts.

 
Evgeniy Chumakov:


Never, and never under this system are different concepts.

I'm clear with you).

 
Uladzimir Izerski:

I see what you mean.)


You don't. What do you want?

 
Evgeniy Chumakov:


Not with you. What did you want?

From you?

A ready-made formula for the grail)))))

 
Uladzimir Izerski:

From you?

Ready formula for the grail)))))


You have your own, so use )))))))
 
Uladzimir Izerski:

From you?

Ready formula for the grail)))))

option, me too)

but judging by the accounts on this system in livantos, the formula is not ready yet

;)

 

I slightly revised the formula for channel calculation. There was one deal of GBPUSD on the 13th date with observation window of 30 minutes.




Now we need to make more tests on different pairs, as it may be a special case. It is necessary to determine which formula is better, to be exact, the formula is the same, but the data is different.

 
Renat Akhtyamov:


but judging by the accounts in the livantos, the formula is not yet ready


That's because they think - "under this system" . And in the end they end up with what Alexander was talking about.

 
Evgeniy Chumakov:


That's because they think - "according to this system" . And in the end they end up with what Alexander was talking about.

You mean a grail-splitter?

Zhenya, take it as a joke, no offence.

Show me the picture for June 14 on the euro without changing any ratios

and then

depending on the outcome.

the tenets of this thread will start to sound convincing.

Reason: