From theory to practice - page 423

[Alexander_K2]

Yury Kirillov:
The Grail is not charts - it is profitable trades. The charts are an artistic creation.

I agree, Yuri.

But, for some reason, it seems to me that when there are only really profitable trades, I won't be on the forum. Alas, it's human nature.

In the meantime, I am happy to share my findings with the traders' community.

Look at charts 2 and 3 - isn't it the Grail?

[Alexander_K2]

Here on graphs 1 and 2 I can give my comments, because graph 1 with the calculation of dispersion - my merit, despite the objections of Asaulenko, permission to comment on the graph 2 received from Koldun, but the graph 3 - the parameter is taken from this branch and not I proposed it. If someone realises this and writes about it, I will immediately start commenting on it as well.

[Mykola Demko]

Alexander_K2:

By the way, watching another apparently losing EURUSD trade in real time, I officially declare:

Without the "trend/float" parameter there is nothing to do in the market

And since I do not have enough intelligence to find it, I have to resort to the last chance - to use the neuronet for searching for it.

I will be away from the forum for a while.

Good luck!

Oiled up, you'll get more confused with the NS than you will be useful. It's much simpler than that.

Just look at the tick data carefully and you'll understand how to separate out the flat/trend.

They don't even use degrees in the formula, +-*/ everything is at the level of arithmetic.

[Aleksey Nikolayev]

Renat Akhtyamov:

For a quick answer, it goes like this:

https://www.oanda.com/lang/ru/forex-trading/analysis/open-position-ratios

You mean something likeOpen interest andlong-short ratio?

1) They don't seem to count well for all forex - because it doesn't have a single centre (in your example they only count for oanda clients).

2) In my view, their use implicitly assumes that the supply-demand principle works for forex as for ordinary commodities. This is hardly true.

[Alexander_K2]

Nikolay Demko:

Oiled up, you'll be more confused with NS than helpful. It's much simpler than that.

Just look at the tick data carefully and you will understand how to separate the flat/trend.

There's not even a degree used in the formula, +-*/ everything is at the level of arithmetic.

No, I didn't have time, thank God, to run to the neuronet.

I just looked at the graphs 2 and 3 and almost fell off my chair. I think parameter 3 is responsible for trend/float

[Evgeniy Chumakov]

Alexander_K2:
Here on the graph 1 and 2 I can give my comments, as the graph 1 with the dispersion calculation - my merit, despite the objections of Asaulenko, permission to comment on the graph 2 received from Koldun, and here is graph 3 - the parameter is taken from this branch and I did not offer it. If someone realises this and writes about it, I will immediately start commenting on it as well.

1. Graph = price

2. Graph = increments

3 .Graph = Rate of increment

[Alexander_K2]

Evgeniy Chumakov:

1. Graph = price

2. The graph = increments

3 .Graph = Rate of increment

2 - sum of increments in time window

3 - almost true

[Evgeniy Chumakov]

Alexander_K2:

3 - almost true

The incremental velocity of the increments

[Alexander_K2]

Same for AUDCHF this week:

[Dmitriy Skub]

Alexander_K2:

Same for AUDCHF this week:

So "where's the money, Zin?")