
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The Grail is not charts - it is profitable trades. The charts are an artistic creation.
I agree, Yuri.
But, for some reason, it seems to me that when there are only really profitable trades, I won't be on the forum. Alas, it's human nature.
In the meantime, I am happy to share my findings with the traders' community.
Look at charts 2 and 3 - isn't it the Grail?
By the way, watching another apparently losing EURUSD trade in real time, I officially declare:
Without the "trend/float" parameter there is nothing to do in the market
And since I do not have enough intelligence to find it, I have to resort to the last chance - to use the neuronet for searching for it.
I will be away from the forum for a while.
Good luck!
Oiled up, you'll get more confused with the NS than you will be useful. It's much simpler than that.
Just look at the tick data carefully and you'll understand how to separate out the flat/trend.
They don't even use degrees in the formula, +-*/ everything is at the level of arithmetic.
For a quick answer, it goes like this:
https://www.oanda.com/lang/ru/forex-trading/analysis/open-position-ratios
You mean something likeOpen interest andlong-short ratio?
1) They don't seem to count well for all forex - because it doesn't have a single centre (in your example they only count for oanda clients).
2) In my view, their use implicitly assumes that the supply-demand principle works for forex as for ordinary commodities. This is hardly true.
Oiled up, you'll be more confused with NS than helpful. It's much simpler than that.
Just look at the tick data carefully and you will understand how to separate the flat/trend.
There's not even a degree used in the formula, +-*/ everything is at the level of arithmetic.
No, I didn't have time, thank God, to run to the neuronet.
I just looked at the graphs 2 and 3 and almost fell off my chair. I think parameter 3 is responsible for trend/float
Here on the graph 1 and 2 I can give my comments, as the graph 1 with the dispersion calculation - my merit, despite the objections of Asaulenko, permission to comment on the graph 2 received from Koldun, and here is graph 3 - the parameter is taken from this branch and I did not offer it. If someone realises this and writes about it, I will immediately start commenting on it as well.
1. Graph = price
2. Graph = increments
3 .Graph = Rate of increment
1. Graph = price
2. The graph = increments
3 .Graph = Rate of increment
2 - sum of increments in time window
3 - almost true
3 - almost trueThe incremental velocity of the increments
Same for AUDCHF this week:
Same for AUDCHF this week: