You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
No, it's not because of that
if you remove the trend from the quotient (i.e. limit it to the analysis of increments over time x), it is this trend that takes you into minus
And vice versa: if you take a flat off the cotier, then it is this flat...
)
Confusing I'm going to make the most shameful EURUSD trade all the readers of this thread. I'll keep it to myself. Like a diary.
...
Here we are, here we are.
You're the only one writing nonsense, catching a spherical horse in a vacuum.
That's why no one responds.
Your programme is blind
Agreed. Through experimental and practical data, I was able to obtain the following table for the trend/flat parameter:
1. Hurst parameter - no.
2. Pearson asymmetry coefficient - no
3. nonentropy - ?
4. incremental velocity - ?
So far I work without this key parameter at all - I'm just gathering statistics.
Is there a universal forum that divides data into trend/fleet? (in real time without delays, not on history)
With such a formula, it's like sending two bytes of money.
K2's got some kind of formula for a flat, looks like it.
The rest is probably trending.
but there's no way to trade it,
I have no idea what to do with it.
It's not even that, it's the lack of a systematic approach. There is no substitute for brute force distributions).
Uh-huh
But it's funny.
Here we are, here we are.
Thank you, Nikolai.
Heartfelt. From the heart, as they say.
Agreed. Through experimental and practical data, the following table was obtained for the trend/flat parameter:
1. Hurst parameter - no.
2. Pearson asymmetry coefficient - no
3. nonentropy - ?
4. incremental velocity - ?
So far, I work without this key parameter - I'm just gathering statistics.
It's good if you can find it.
but wouldn't it be easier to look at the supply/demand ratio?
the answer is no, it's not.
but maybe
but isn't it easier to look at the supply/demand ratio
Still, do you think OI?
Still, do you think the OI?
Among other things.
Take the information from wherever you can, check it out.
Predictions and implications just get bogged down in the discussion on this topicDo you think it's the OI after all?