From theory to practice - page 144
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Anyone interested - do your own processing of AUDCHF data (see attached file), as I did earlier for AUDCAD. Look at the results, just don't fall off your chair like I did.
Anyone interested - do your own processing of AUDCHF data (see attached file), as I did earlier for AUDCAD. Look at the results, just don't fall off your chair like I did.
There are no time stamps again. Is this already exponent sampling or do I have to do it?
There are no time stamps again. Is this already sampling exponentially or should we do it?
The Physicists along with the Chemists will tear up the forum!
As well as their Nerds! )))
What are you guys up to? Has the forum been closed already? Because I went to the terminal today, there's still some chart hanging around. )))
The Physicists along with the Chemists will tear up the forum!
and their Nerds! ))))
What are you guys up to? Has the forum been closed already? Because I went to the terminal today, there's still some schedule dangling there. )))
:)))
No, I can hardly do it by myself. But if a million traders will start to pump the forex by grail, then everything is possible. Well, good riddance! Let's go back to the Soviet Union, which is exactly what I want.
To the question of "Markovian - not Markovian.
Here's the autocorrelation.
We see that there is a significant correlation between ticks even above 60,000. And in the first 40,000 ticks the correlation is almost solid.
Although the distribution looks nice.
It's the usual, why the uneven scale? Why the ticks?
I don't get it. The trading idea itself is to lose when the trend corrects sideways...
One other thing. A very common one is cyclicality for absolute values of increments.
I've already posted it once for watchmakers - it looks very similar. How to use it is not clear
Guys, it's time for practice.
It's about time.
Guys, it's time for practice.
It's time already.
it will be after the new year)
One other thing. A very common one is cyclicality for absolute incremental values.
I've already posted it once for watchmakers - it looks very similar. How to use it is not clear