From theory to practice - page 1979 1...1972197319741975197619771978197919801981 New comment Uladzimir Izerski 2021.01.06 19:56 #19781 Renat Akhtyamov:Not really. it's not going to turn the price around. ;) The main thing is to notice it in time. And they will turn it around without you. Renat Akhtyamov 2021.01.06 20:02 #19782 Uladzimir Izerski:The main thing is to notice it in time. And they'll turn around without you. No, why? The grail is being turned. Uladzimir Izerski 2021.01.06 20:07 #19783 Renat Akhtyamov:no, why? grail tilting. Sometimes agrail-like rake is inserted instead of a grail . secret 2021.01.06 20:51 #19784 Alexander_K:Still, I wonder if anyone can plot the dependence of the current increment on the previous increment for: 1. GSF with Gaussian distribution N(0,1) It does not depend on the type of distribution. L is logic. Alexander_K2 2021.01.07 21:54 #19785 Made for: 1. Wiener process without drift with Gaussian distribution of increments 2. Market process for GBPUSD on Seconds TF S6 It's crazy... Some kind of square... That's what the dependence of the current increment on the previous one looks like on the phase plane. The sampling volume is the same. Random Flow Theory and Profit from a random Average daily journey in Доктор 2021.01.07 21:57 #19786 Alexander_K2:It's a square... More like a rhombus. Alexander_K 2021.01.07 21:59 #19787 Доктор:More like a rhombus. Yes. I don't know how to interpret it yet, but it's beautiful... Доктор 2021.01.07 22:01 #19788 Alexander_K:Yes. I don't know how to interpret it yet, but it's beautiful... Could be a square, though. BecauseWiener's is supposed to be a circle and there's an ellipse. Apparently the scale on the axes is different. Alexander_K 2021.01.07 22:06 #19789 Доктор:Although it could be a square. BecauseWiener's is supposed to be a circle, but it's an ellipse. Apparently the scale is different on the axes. It's a circle, of course. I made it in haste, in order to see the Unknown. Доктор 2021.01.07 22:06 #19790 Alexander_K:Yes. Not sure how to interpret it yet, but - beautiful... Looks like the probability of small increments and large increments being adjacent is higher thanWiener's. Interesting. 1...1972197319741975197619771978197919801981 New comment
Not really.
it's not going to turn the price around.
;)
The main thing is to notice it in time. And they will turn it around without you.
The main thing is to notice it in time. And they'll turn around without you.
No, why?
The grail is being turned.
no, why?
grail tilting.
Sometimes agrail-like rake is inserted instead of a grail .
Still, I wonder if anyone can plot the dependence of the current increment on the previous increment for:
1. GSF with Gaussian distribution N(0,1)
It does not depend on the type of distribution. L is logic.
Made for:
1. Wiener process without drift with Gaussian distribution of increments
2. Market process for GBPUSD on Seconds TF S6
It's crazy...
Some kind of square...
That's what the dependence of the current increment on the previous one looks like on the phase plane.
The sampling volume is the same.
It's a square...
More like a rhombus.
More like a rhombus.
Yes.
I don't know how to interpret it yet, but it's beautiful...
Yes.
I don't know how to interpret it yet, but it's beautiful...
Could be a square, though. BecauseWiener's is supposed to be a circle and there's an ellipse. Apparently the scale on the axes is different.
Although it could be a square. BecauseWiener's is supposed to be a circle, but it's an ellipse. Apparently the scale is different on the axes.
It's a circle, of course. I made it in haste, in order to see the Unknown.
Yes.
Not sure how to interpret it yet, but - beautiful...
Looks like the probability of small increments and large increments being adjacent is higher thanWiener's. Interesting.