Registration for the Real Accounts (Cents) Championship July 2017 . - page 86
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
We often take some truths we think are axiomatic. Truth, that's all. Why argue with what is supposedly obvious? Meanwhile, most discoveries have been made when an individual, perhaps a school slacker or just the inquisitive over-zealous type, asked about another immutable truth: "And why?" And it turns out that not all that glitters is gold, the first pancake isn't always the same, something heavier than air can fly, the planet isn't flat... Examples abound.
The argument is totally pointless.
We often take some truths we think are axiomatic. Truth, that's all. Why argue with what is supposedly obvious? Meanwhile, most discoveries have been made when an individual, perhaps a school slacker or just the inquisitive over-zealous type, asked about another immutable truth: "And why?" And it turns out that not all that glitters is gold, the first pancake isn't always the same, something heavier than air can fly, the planet isn't flat... Examples abound.
There are as many people as there are opinions.
One will argue that you have to put 10 quid on the account and open it on full margin, if you guessed right, you take a profit, if you didn't guess right, you put 10 quid back on the account and so on. And he will claim that this is 100% correct.
Someone enters the market with 1% of the deposit by the size of the stop loss and they will also claim that this is the best MM management.
Someone enters the market with the minimum lot and is not afraid of no-backs, because this is the best money management in their opinion.
And this is not all options are listed, and each category will support exactly that solution, which they use, and it is impossible to convince them otherwise.
There are as many people as there are opinions.
One will argue that you have to put 10 quid on the account and open it on full margin, if you guessed right, you take a profit, if you didn't guess right, you put 10 quid back on the account and so on. And he will claim that this is 100% correct.
Someone enters the market with 1% of the deposit by the size of the stop loss and they will also claim that this is the best MM management.
Someone enters the market with the minimum lot and is not afraid of no-backs, because this is the best money management in their opinion.
And this is not all options are listed, and each category will support exactly that solution, which they use, and it is impossible to convince them otherwise.
New participants have been added.
Best wishes for success!
Here is a description of all the formulas, if you have any questions, ask. The only thing is that Sharpe has been changed to "Recovery Factor".
Thank you. It's already clearer what and where.
The recovery factor can take the value 0. How has that been dealt with?
Thank you. It's already clearer what and where from.
The recovery factor can take the value 0. How did you deal with that?
What's the problem with that?
What's there to assume... You can see the results of the formula calculations on the current data.
And what do you not like this quite reasonable "way out of the situation"Score =Gain/Drawdown
Oleg, put it into a tooltip to try it out, it shows when you hover over it.
Oleg, put it in a tooltip to try it out, it shows up when you hover over it.
Yeah, I see it. But the numbers there are all wrong.
Both Gain and Drawdown should be taken in absolute values, not relative.
Gain = 334.81 USD.
Drawdown =327.89 USD (Risk tab)
Point=Gain/Loss= 334.81/327.89 = 1.0211
But in this form the formula is still raw, in my opinion.
And why Avtomat? I do not need plagiarism. If you are indicating the author, the proposal was made by Aleksandr Safronov and I supported it.