Somewhere long ago I read an article which mathematically proved the possibility of making money from random walks, but unfortunately I did not keep the link. And the formulas there all came together. If it is possible to make money on the SB, it is possible to make money on the market with the help of robots.
Well, no. We are sort of looking at "proven profit from using autotrading". This is where the 'head' ends with the last written line of the EA.
And, if we are talking about martin - no "movement" needed here. There is a bet which with roughly equal probabilities can win or lose.
How can you do that without movement? In a casino, does the roulette wheel spin or not? In forex, if the price stands still, no trade will close either in the + or in the -. If you do not feel the movement, it means that you are already in the other world).
Again, the question is whether there is such a fully automated, profitable algorithm? If there is, there should be evidence of the profitability of fully automated trading in forex.
There are plenty of them on the market.
The only problem is that some may not be happy with the profitability/profitability and frequency of trades.
With the right approach to risk, many merging algorithms can become profitable.
And there are no other strategies without martingale? But I'm not convinced by the martingale either.
Not convinced by what? That it gives a stable profit, until it is lost? And with the right selection of parameters, the probability of losing is so small that the probability of "Earth hitting the celestial axis" is greater?
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
...
And, if we are talking about martin - there is no need for any "movement" here. There is a bet that with roughly equal probabilities can win or lose.
In martin, probability is irrelevant: there is MOTION - there is profit; no MOTION - no profit (we are not talking about long series "against" now)
Well, no. We are sort of looking at "proven profit from using autotrading". This is where the 'head' ends with the last written line of the EA.
And, if we are talking about martin - no "movement" needed here. There is a bet which with roughly equal probabilities can win or lose.
How can you do that without movement? In a casino, does the roulette wheel spin or not? In forex, if the price stands still, no trade will close either in the + or in the -. If you do not feel the movement, it means that you are already in the other world).
Is there a theory that proves that fully automated forex trading can be profitable?
If there is no such theory, it should be developed!
;)
Again, the question is whether there is such a fully automated, profitable algorithm? If there is, there should be evidence of the profitability of fully automated trading in forex.
Hi there,
I'm not sure what other strategies are available without martingale. But I'm not convinced by the martingale either.
If there is no such theory, it should be developed!
;)
Quite right.
And the Chinese comrades suggest the same - post here.
Quite right.
And the Chinese comrades suggest the same thing - post here.
That's right. You need a theoretical basis. Otherwise, it's a mess.
And there are no other strategies without martingale? But I'm not convinced by the martingale either.