Actually, manual indicators aren't really necessary either. Except to simplify the perception. For manual trading I need only 2 MAKs. In this case, they are not used directly in any way.
Alexandr Bryzgalov: And yet you are here, not in a bank).
I haven't invested a penny of my own money and don't intend to in the future. I used to work in a huge enterprise, as a deputy manager, and I know what it's like to issue shares and only a few of them are rich.
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
I wonder how you got the idea to hand outprofitable algorithms:) . I'm out, I'm out.
I can't do it manually )
Hypothetically? - Absolutely. In fact, doubtful.
it's stochastic.
it's by stochastic
Bullshit, doesn't reflect the full picture.....
Bullshit, does not reflect the full picture.....
Alexandr Bryzgalov:
All tics are the most accurate method.
And yet you are here, not in a bank).
I haven't invested a penny of my own money and don't intend to in the future. I used to work in a huge enterprise, as a deputy manager, and I know what it's like to issue shares and only a few of them are rich.
Because all my money is invested in a piggy bank and to pay $30 for a signal, I would have to smash it, and that would tear my soul!
This is the signal I found yesterday, and it's quite an interesting situation
This is the signal I found yesterday, and it's quite an interesting situation
We see a good example - it doesn't matter what the signal is, the main thing is marketing ))