An imbalance of subscribers among signal providers - page 8
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
We are trying to get MQL5 management to make corrections concerning the display of subscribers of signal providers. Unfortunately, showing subscribers with a critical gap between the first and other signal providers by a factor of 4, or 10 for most providers, is not a friendly environment for providers with the minimum number of subscribers.
The choice of potential subscribers becomes not quite sober, as most providers choose the signal with the biggest number of subscribers.
We suggest that the MQL5 management introduce the following changes.
If the signal has more than 100 Subscribers, e.g. 450, the signal should be displayed in the order of 100+. However, if a Subscriber selects this signal, it will be available for displaying all Subscribers (450). Also the ISP itself sees the number of subscribers.
This change would be more equitable for all providers, and the selection of subscribers would be more sober.
Please support us in this initiative. Please votehttps://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/162863.
Do not develop other ideas in these threads. Apparently there are more people who don't want equalisation
Aren't you bored?
It's the subscribers' choice. The money belongs to the subscribers and they can spend it as they see fit.
Sounds like an imbalance in your head!
And your stats are wrong. Stop defaming the signals service.
Aren't you bored?
It is the subscribers' choice. The money belongs to the subscribers and they can spend it as they see fit.
Sounds like an imbalance in your head!
IMHO. Toad seems to have got it all worked out.
Comrades, on the contrary, you should take an example from the man. You've done it, you've done it well!
Don't sit around and think how to screw him, because his work is so good and mine is so bad. Work, work and work again.
All in good time. Go to church, apologize to those you offended, pay your debts, etc...
Clean your karma first and do not envy anybody with that attitude, you cannot.
With such attitudes, intentions and greed no one has ever achieved anything serious in his life.
Aren't you bored?
It is the subscribers' choice. The money belongs to the subscribers and they can spend it as they see fit.
Sounds like an imbalance in your head!
And your stats are wrong. Stop vilifying the signals service.
IMHO. Toad's got it all worked out.
Comrades, on the contrary, we need to take an example from the man. He did it and achieved it - well done!
And do not sit around and think how to screw him, because his work is great and mine is just so-so. Work, work and work again.
All in good time. Go to church, apologize to those you offended, pay your debts, etc...
Clean your karma for starters and do not envy anybody with that attitude, you cannot. You should not envy anybody with that kind of attitude and greed, no one has ever achieved anything serious in life.
IMHO. The toad seems to have got hold of him to the fullest extent.
Comrades, on the contrary, we must take an example from the man. He did it and achieved it - well done!
And do not sit around and think how to screw him, because his work is great and my work is like that - no way. Work, work and work again.
All in good time. Go to church, apologize to those you offended, pay your debts, etc...
Clean your karma first and do not envy anybody with that attitude, you cannot.
With that kind of attitude, intentions and greed no one has ever achieved anything serious in his life.
That's a good one. I totally agree with you. Like).
Don't spam the branch. We are posting stats, are you in any way being disadvantaged by these numbers...
You're the only one spamming here. You're the signal seller, not me. How do you know the full breakdown of the number of subscribers?
Some signals drop from the showcase, but they have subscribers, you are providing misleading information and misleading users.
Spaider85:
it's pure "self-propaganda"?