Any rookie question, so as not to clutter up the forum. Professionals, don't pass by. Nowhere without you - 6. - page 487
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
how is that?
and this:
will never be fulfilled.
therefore:
will always work with every order.
CONCLUSION: everything is wrong.
Your function needs to be thought through, I don't have a quick answer.
But at least it's like this to start with:
Good afternoon ! Mt4 is not installing, terminal.exe gives error ( terminal.exe - error detected, application will be closed) at the end of the terminal loading ! The hardware is old - Microsoft Windows XP Professional 2002 service pack 3, Intel(R) Celeron(TM) CPU 1200 MHz 1.20 GHz. 384 MB RAM-, but until the new year (November-December) was installed all right, and now no way, with instaforeks (version 5.0.0.804) Load and then gives an error from other sites at all is not loaded anything ! I've already deleted my antivirus and remotely deleted previous terminals via Revo Unistaler. Perhaps that is because I had recently stopped some local services (which do not remember) ???
Your processor probably does not support the SSE2 command set - check
How do I do that?
I want to use close orders as percentage of deposit, I already tried your version, it only closes positive profits, but how to make it close negative profits, i.e. not profits?
Ok
I am a beginner, i do not know much.
OK
everyone's learning, so that's fine.
Thank you so much, it's working.
Your processor probably does not support the SSE2 command set - check
Yes, it does, but why was it working a couple of months ago? So do you have to replace the computer or what?
I can't figure it out because I'm confused by the comma after 8.
Or another way, how to read 8,01129039727145009060093343395e+8328 as a whole number, so that this number will be comma-free.
Note: the digits following the comma from the above number can be represented as zeros.
Yeah, it doesn't, but why was it working a few months ago? So do we have to change the computer or what?
Do you know how many years ago this set of commands came about? Of course, your grandfather was still saving the bunnies from the flood.
When Ind_1 and Ind_GV settings match, Ind_GV has a slightly different result value than Ind_1.
If I pause the tester while Ind_1 and Ind_GV are matched and compile Ind_GV, the resulting value of both indicators matches completely.
Who knows how this can be explained?