MACHINE period with minus value - page 25

 
FAQ:

You can do anything, but what good will it do?

To find the answer to this question, I would advise to talk less and do more when there is no logic
 
And time is passing and nothing is teaching you.
 
FAQ:
Time is ticking away and you are learning nothing.


Mind you, since you have amnesia, you've already had 6 (already 7) flooded posts (i.e. about nothing) in the last 2 pages! so your time is running out...

As for me, I give out step-by-step information for programmers (i.e. hints)

As for your threats, you are not interested in opening topics and their development, you just want to flood and close the topic, oh yeah, well, and ban anyone, that's your job, well, it's easier than to clean the thread from flooding and let the topic develop, lead it to the goal

 
Everyone rushed straight to do Caesar's bidding... ward six rests... you're funny...
 
FAQ:
Everyone's jumping at Caesar's orders... Ward six is resting... funny you...

Caesar34:

As for me, I give out step-by-step information for programmers (i.e. hints)


you've got three minutes left, and that's how many of you there are... Caesars and the like and they all suffered your fate.
 
alsu:

Yusuf, the inconsistency, let me explain with some simple reasoning.

If your function guesses behaviour 40% of the time, it fails to guess 60% of the time. To "decompose" this 60 into 40 and 20 would require knowing in advance that the function failed to guess. But if we know this in advance (and hence also know about success in advance), we are thus able to safely operate with 100% success in the very same 40% of the time. We arrive at a contradiction with the "60/40 in our favour" ratio, from which it follows that the original assumption is wrong.

Think about it))



Yes, indeed, expressed incorrectly. What I mean is that TS puts orders according to the pattern we have found and the results should always be about 60/40 in our favour. Only then we can say that TS guesses correctly in 2 out of 5 cases and purely by accident guesses 1 more trade out of the remaining 3.
 
sultonov:


What do you think about this "I was wondering if we could lower the chart movements by a certain number of pips below its true position, or raise it (for example 30-50 pips (4 decimal places)?
 
sultonov:
Yes indeed, that's not what I meant. What I mean is that the TS puts orders according to the pattern we have found and the results should always be about 60/40 in our favour. Only then we can say that the TS guesses correctly in 2 out of 5 cases and purely by chance guesses 1 more trade out of the remaining 3.

Still doesn't enter. If we place orders according to the pattern we have found, we should only get 40 per cent correct answers. If the results are 60/40 in our favor, it means that the function guessed 60% of the answers, i.e. the initial estimation of the function performance is wrong.
 
Caesar34:

What do you say about this "I have an idea, can we lower the chart movements by a certain number of pips below its true position, or go up (for example 30-50 pips (4 decimal places)?
You have already been pointed out by many that you are fundamentally on the wrong track. A mashka with a negative period is nonsense, which is a disgrace to the very principle of its construction. Look carefully at the formula from where it is calculated and you will remove your own question. Even constructing a simple linear regression is more useful than raping a dummy. With such persistence you can succeed if you change your view of the market.
 
sultonov:
Many have already pointed out to you that you are in principle on the wrong path. A MA with a negative period is nonsense, which is a nonsense that defeats the very principle of its construction. Look carefully at the formula from where it is calculated and you will remove your own question. Even constructing a simple linear regression is more useful than raping a dummy. With such persistence you can succeed if you change your view of the market.

Yusuf, the question here is different... Why are you advising him anything in terms of profit/loss, better/worse, etc.? He doesn't need it. Read the branch title.

+ on top of that he hasn't even bothered to lay out what he thinks the definition of this very MA of a negative period is and everything that goes on about deciding to build it in his opinion.

Conclusion: the topic is a complete lajagon.