Not the Grail, just a regular one - Bablokos!!! - page 116

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I won't show you a certificate that I'm not crazy.)
You really shouldn't, especially nowadays you can buy any kind of certificate. Valera, you are easy to spot under any nickname even without a certificate: even Singapur, even pretend to be Honduras.
Has anyone ever wondered how multi-points came to adverse patterns, and why these patterns have these particular shapes?
Mr Reshetov, you seem to know a lot about theoretical theories, could you tell me where the problem is?
I don't need to be littered with non-personal messages. Especially since you are asking questions in public.
Here's a private message:
If there is reason to confirm 0 expectation of martin, please indicate the error in Avals solution or, alternatively, in the interpretation of the result - not equal probability of 3 tails in a row against 7 eagles in a row.
Suppose we're playing a "harmless" game of heads or tails, i.e. the probability of heads or tails is 0.5.
Let's take an easier problem, i.e. the player has $3 in his pocket, an initial bet of $1 and a martingale strategy. Play continues until the player has no money left for the next martingale bet or his winnings are $3.
Calculate the expectation at the end of the game:
MO = 3 * 27 / 64 - 3 * 16 / 64 - 2 * 12 / 64 - 1 * 9 / 64 = (81 - 81) / 64 = 0
Sum of probabilities taken into account: (27 + 16 + 12 + 9) / 64 = 64 / 64 = 1, i.e., the full probability theorem is satisfied
I don't need an easier task. I solved this problem a long time ago myself. There is a statement of the problem, this problem needs an analytical solution for any parameters. There is a solution but it does not contain something wrong. What is it?
So, two points for you, for a solution of what is more convenient (and how is more convenient - some figures instead of formulas), and not what is needed.
What about the personal part? You're making fun of me here, so I wanted to see if it's justified.