R - please share your experiences - page 4

 

RandomWorker:

The information about the future is in the past.

The treasures are also in the ground (someone buried them there in the past). And the Earth is big and round. The "scary secret" that the treasures are buried in the ground, without exact coordinates, is useless information.

 
Reshetov:

The treasures are also in the ground. And the Earth is big and round. The "scary secret" about treasures being buried in the ground, without exact coordinates, is useless information.

I'm not inclined to think that the people who wrote the 3500 packets of statistics don't know that. So there's something useful out there, and it's nothing in the kodobase. My question is why there is no attempt to use R and the use of analogues is extremely rare. Except for neural nets, which are part of R, just related to something else. That's what surprises me.
 
RandomWorker: So there's something useful there, and it's not in the kodobase.

Have you ever thought that in order to use a tool properly, you first need to know how to use it and only then will the tool (in your case R) be of use to you. Google resources that discuss R, you might be able to learn on your own. http://herba.msu.ru/shipunov/software/r/r-ru.htm

ZS: A screw driven with a hammer holds better than a nail driven with a screwdriver.

 
RandomWorker:
I'm not inclined to think that the people who wrote the 3500 packets of statistics don't know that. So there's something useful out there, and it's nothing in the kodobase. My question is why there is no attempt to use R and the use of analogues is extremely rare. Except for neural nets, which are part of R, just related to something else. Here's what surprises me.

Because:

There are three kinds of lies: innocent lies, outright lies and statistics (c) Mark Twain

3500 packets of lies is too much for a codebase.

 

RandomWorker:
Мой вопрос, почему нет попыток использовать R и крайне редки использования аналогов. За исключением нейросеток, которые часть R, только еще с чем-то связанные. Вот что меня удивляет.


Single traders who openly demonstrate their strategies rarely use R. Those who trade professionally and use R in their research usually discuss the research among their peers.

If you want to do some research and you have questions about the means of language - formulate them, I will prompt you. If you want ready-made strategies - you are wasting your time.

 
anonymous:


Those who trade professionally and use R in their research usually discuss the research amongst their peers.

And I thought that people who are professionally involved in trading are here .......

Suddenly R language is too complicated. Something more complicated than mql.

 
Reshetov:

Because:

There are three kinds of lies: innocent lies, outright lies and statistics (c) Mark Twain

3,500 packets of lies is too many for codebase.

Amazing post with your rating. Or are you laughing at me?
 
IgorM:

Have you ever thought that in order to use a tool properly, you first need to know how to use it and only then will the tool (in your case R) be of use to you. Google resources that discuss R, you might be able to learn on your own. http://herba.msu.ru/shipunov/software/r/r-ru.htm

ZS: a screw driven with a hammer holds better than a nail driven with a screwdriver

I've got that, but thanks anyway.
 
RandomWorker:

And I thought there were people here who trade professionally .......


Alas... https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/6787

Suddenly R language is too complicated. Something more complicated than mql.

But much easier than C++ :D

 
anonymous:


Alas... https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/6787

But much easier than C++ :D

I think there's a statistics section for articles, but the articles are kind of homegrown.

The FAA had a branch on forecasting. It brought up the problem of "predictability" of the model and it was over. Could it be because of EViews? Or no one to discuss it with?

Reason: