At the request of workers I lay out an Expert Advisor, charts of which I laid out a little above, in fact, the usual anti-martin, imitation of zeroing of demo account was not laid, because it would simply mean the reset of the lot and close the open positions when the demo is lost, which is not "ace" :).
The entry system is quite trivial: at the breakdown of the last formed zigzag ray. The most primitive entry point, but does not prevent pouring in the trend. After the first losing trade it resets the lot. After taking profit it instantly opens the next trade with larger lot on the trend. There is a limitation on maximum lot. Take Profit should preferably be larger than Stop Loss. I haven't done it in the tester, but I think it may be set up to grow nicely with or without Martin. It is desirable to set up Long and Short systems separately.
imho, anti-martin is preferable to martin, and the absence of both is good news :)
/I added it to make everything clear; testing, though on open prices, but M1 and obviously with a considerable time of deal holding, which is not bad at all - Mathemat/
Strategy Tester Report
Martin
Alpari-Demo (Build 402)
Symbol
EURUSD (Euro vs US Dollar)
Period
1 Minute (M1) 1999.11.01 02:02 - 2011.10.14 23:59
Model
By open prices (only for Expert Advisors with explicit bar opening control)
At the request of workers I lay out an Expert Advisor, charts of which I laid out a little above, in fact, the usual anti-martin, imitation of zeroing of demo account was not laid, because it would simply mean the reset of the lot and close the open positions when the demo is lost, which is not "ace" :).
The entry system is quite trivial: at the breakdown of the last formed zigzag ray. The most primitive entry point, but does not prevent pouring in the trend. After the first losing trade it resets the lot. After taking profit it instantly opens the next trade with larger lot on the trend. There is a limitation on maximum lot. Take Profit should preferably be larger than Stop Loss. I haven't done it in the tester, but I think it may be set up to grow nicely with or without Martin. It is desirable to set up Long and Short systems separately.
imho, anti-martin is preferable to martin, and the absence of both is good news :)
/I added it to make everything clear; testing, though on open prices, but M1 and obviously with a considerable time of deal holding, which is not bad at all - Mathemat/
Strategy Tester Report
I just wanted to reduce everything to the fact that it is necessary to have an absolutely loss-making system (of which there are a huge number).
I have chosen Martin only because of his speed of losing small depots (and he does not lose big ones too badly, it's just a matter of time).
I have decided on the name IGRAIL.)
you just have to have a totally loss-making system(of which there are a huge number).
It is not.
Well, yes.
1. Martin's a shifter.
2. Martin in a refill.
3. A bunchindicator system with and without martin
I can't remember anything else
Well, yes.
1. Martin's a shifter.
2. Martin in a refill.
3. A bunchindicator system with and without martin
I can't remember anything else
and the whole thing is a drain on the spread, ONLY
and the whole thing is a spread-only drain, ONLY.