
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
You don't have access to the exchange, you have access to what the broker gave you. I ran into this in 2008 when it delayed quotes for a few minutes and then jumped.
Change brokers. But when it comes to high-frequency trading, no independent vendors are going to help here. The advantage in speed of access and execution is achieved by colocation (placing trading servers directly next to exchange servers) and some nuances in legislation, which give a technical advantage in speed with a certain ordering scheme
change your broker. But when it comes to high-frequency trading, no independent providers will help. The advantage in speed of access and execution is achieved by colocation (placing trading servers directly next to exchange servers) and some nuances in legislation, which gives a technical advantage in speed with a certain ordering scheme
There is a discussion about the future of the methaquot policy, the topic was not banned, so I am speaking out.
The prospects are great! If they implement in the new platform what I need, I will kiss them. Reputation is a bit damaged by plug-ins... and 2Y standards...
It seems that everything for a trader is simple and convenient and usable...... and not... the main thing - ungreater opportunities to take money - for brokerage companies - main clients ..... A kind of compromise policy.
jelizavettka:
The main thing is that there is no money laundering opportunity - for DCs - major clients
Matlab is an example of software openness. EV is a very closed system.
I don't swing the rights, and you're not on the arrow. There is a discussion about the future of the meta-quota policy, the topic has not been banned, so I am speaking out.
Agreed, hadn't thought about pips. probably with M1.
This is where independent suppliers will be needed, based on historical quotes for analysis.
Not just ticks - as they want to do now.
We need stats on ticks - but that's obviously not the subject of MetaQuotes.
As long as the OSNLV standard - they give it.
As for the new standards for historical quotes, I haven't found a civilised debate yet. (
Agreed, hadn't thought about pips. probably with M1.
I gave an example for the specialised, how trading is done on an electronic exchange without intermediaries in the form of brokers. WebMoney exchanger does not differ from the exchange, because all the same is present: the rate, spread, demand, supply, commission. Only there are no brokers, and therefore there is no additional overheads and time costs.
It is difficult to promote mt5 to the exchange, not because of technical capabilities (they are much higher than those of many brokers' software), but because brokers have their own private solutions and departments that deal with this. It is safer and more convenient for them to use their crutches than to get hooked on someone else's software and outsourcing