you must have run through history on the recurrence of this phenomenon about the beam.
Does the beam really break down?
No ))) The zig-zag breaks and does not straighten out, forming a local point of no return )))) Just fan should be set so rays are directed to the last knee of zig-zag )))) But this fracture is not always fixed )))) I'm looking for the conditions, under which this fracture becomes most probable )))
Signed with a number -1- and above the zero beam )))
Of course, these rays will intersect somewhere in space, the trend without corrections is 350pp. - does not happen often - of course it will break at some point. (this is the reversal of a 3-month trend - so shot).
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
Again, a correction, no matter how you look at it.
and what has history shown?
you must have run through history on the recurrence of this phenomenon about the beam.
Does the beam really break down?
No ))) The zig-zag breaks and does not straighten out, forming a local point of no return )))) Just fan should be set so rays are directed to the last knee of zig-zag )))) But this fracture is not always fixed )))) I'm looking for the conditions, under which this fracture becomes most probable )))
Thanks to those who salted the bottom ))))
Yeah, Tantric here wanted to thank you for buying on the dip.
Again, a correction, no matter how you look at it.
Of course correction (would not buy buy now would close +) and very close.
Of course a correction (I didn't buy buy buy now I would have closed +) and very close.
Look, there Kolyan is back)))
Signed with a number -1- and above the zero beam )))