[Archive] FOREX - Trends, Forecasts and Consequences (Episode 11: January 2012) - page 601

[Supprimé]
Thanks to those who salted the bottom ))))

Again, a correction, no matter how you look at it.

tuma88:

and what has history shown?

you must have run through history on the recurrence of this phenomenon about the beam.

Does the beam really break down?


No ))) The zig-zag breaks and does not straighten out, forming a local point of no return )))) Just fan should be set so rays are directed to the last knee of zig-zag )))) But this fracture is not always fixed )))) I'm looking for the conditions, under which this fracture becomes most probable )))
margin.call:
Thanks to those who salted the bottom ))))

Yeah, Tantric here wanted to thank you for buying on the dip.
[Supprimé]
Come on))). I thought no one here would fall for it, they're all in the know.
strangerr:

Again, a correction, no matter how you look at it.


Of course correction (would not buy buy now would close +) and very close.
Tantrik:

Of course a correction (I didn't buy buy buy now I would have closed +) and very close.

Look, there Kolyan is back)))
There's a crutch attached to the shoulder. Friday;)
artikul:

Signed with a number -1- and above the zero beam )))
Of course, these rays will intersect somewhere in space, the trend without corrections is 350pp. - does not happen often - of course it will break at some point. (this is the reversal of a 3-month trend - so shot).
[Deleted]
Who reckons we will reach 1.321 today! or after 1.312 and not today?