1st and 2nd derivatives of the MACD - page 2
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
If not on the advisor, can we at least have a quick look at the report? )
Thanks
Here.
ZS. I have tried inverting the indicator signal with the same EA settings - I get the same line, only downwards. Indirect confirmation of the robustness of the system.
I've spun the MACD long enough and realised it doesn't make sense. So the 2nd derivative of it is meaningless cube bullshit.
You have a filter that appears to be low-pass and high-pass (low-frequency clones). Each filter is tuned so that the response of the filter is known constant (which you mentioned) for a certain number of bars and smoothness. The cycle of the big ones is formed only by forming 2 cycles on the smaller ones.
Nate.
Try to play with OsMA, it has fish in it.
Fixed lot. Trailing stop, with dependent SL from the distance of the price to TP. Only OsMA is used, but it has been corrected a little.
I'm sorry, but it's a nonsense to trade on such a primitive, and even on selective static data.
If not on ticks, then take into account the tick volume.
I'm sorry, but trading on such primitive and even on some static data is a nonsense.
If not on ticks, then take into account the tick volume.
It may be bullshit. Who's to say. But the forward is holding on for some reason, the bastard.
Thanks for the suggestion anyway.Primitive I think That's why - because unsteadiness and it changes and changes at the same time on all pairs unsteadily.
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/137034/page2
You have a filter that appears to be low-pass and high-pass (low-frequency clones). Each filter is tuned in such a way that the response of the filter is known constant (which you mentioned) for a certain number of bars and smoothness. The cycle of the larger ones is only formed by forming 2 cycles on the smaller ones.
Seems to be correct, if I understand correctly what you wrote. But if you look closely, you may notice a few unpleasant things that are not immediately apparent. For example, the LPF and VHF go in different directions most of the time. And the amplitude of the VFD is clearly overdamped. The MACD has the same problems plus a few more, which is why I say there is no point in it.
Thanks for the suggestion anyway.Primitive think That's why - because it's unsteady and it changes and changes simultaneously on all parvts unsteadily.
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/137034/page2
You have an unsteady brain. :)
I didn't say it was pure OsMA. It's refined, plus a clever trawl (tests show that this trawl increases MO even on random entries), plus a time filter (non-stationarity? - well, trade in similar areas, i.e. at certain times). All together gives a profitable system.
Simple bricks - an effective system.
It seems to be correct, if I understood it correctly. But if you look closely, you may notice a few unpleasant things that are not immediately apparent. For example, the LPF and VFD go in different directions almost all the time. And the amplitude of the VFD is clearly overdamped. MACD has the same problems, plus some more, that's why I say it has no sense.
I understand what you are talking about on a subconscious level (at least I think so).
How is it always almost? The LPF shows a downward trend but the FHF oscillates near the axis, where is it always almost?
It is important for me to understand the mechanism of McDi's prediction and I will apply it to correctly plotted Renco charts (tick or bar chart, but including tick volume)
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/136996
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/136927
+ possibly I will base the cluster for each currency on the country's exchange index and calculate the total cluster for each currency using its exchange index.
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/137034