[Archive] Learn how to make money villagers! - page 562

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The rate per lakh is still a demo ruble... All owls start with 0.01 lots
One owl Double_Minus_1 - one currency pair - euro-franc (start - see pages before):
Three owls (start - see pages earlier):
When I was talking about the trend/flat I was talking about it - the criterion! There is a branch with a good analyzer https://c.mql4.com/forum/2008/04/TrendFletAnalysis_3.mq4. This analyzer answers why EURCHF pair brings profit to farmers - a counter-trend lasts six months and you do not need a fucking martingale there. The question is how to check if the counter-trend (flat) is over.
(Thanks to Xadviser and Composter)
One currency pair - the euro franc
I have written a currency index indicator using the method proposed by MetaDriver.
I was surprised to find the synchronous movement of USD and JPY indices.
So, dear villagers, USDJPY will also be good for masturbation trading.
I wrote a currency index indicator using the methodology proposed by MetaDriver.
I was surprised to find the synchronous movement of USD and JPY indices.
So, dear villagers, USDJPY is also good for masturbation trading.
I also tried for 8 currencies https://c.mql4.com/forum/2012/01/VininI_CCFp_meta.mq4. But it doesn't work. Why don't you look at it? Or provide your own, or at least a picture.
I will not look through someone else's code, sorry.
I'll think about "presenting my own", maybe I'll post it.
I wrote a currency index indicator using the methodology proposed by MetaDriver.
I was surprised to find the synchronous movement of USD and JPY indices.
So, dear villagers, USDJPY is also good for masturbation trading.
I won't look at someone else's code, sorry.
I'll think about "presenting my own", maybe I'll post it.
Can you post/send it to me? It would be interesting to see.
IMHO, "no bargaining here" (c) - that's to the question: in person/not in person...
If you read the branch first, note that ALL in this branch are talking to each other on a first name basis :-) (with few exceptions) and provide code of interest to villagers from their side in full if desired.
IMHO, "bargaining is not appropriate here" (c) - it's to the question: in person / not in person...
If you read the branch first, note that in this branch ALL talk to each other on a "first name" :-) (with few exceptions) and provide code of interest to villagers from their side to the fullest extent if they wish.