Nikolai Semko: Come on, come on, Automat. Don't listen to anyone. After all, Success is the ability to move from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm...
Success is at least a fraction of a percent improvement on a previous result
and here, rightly pointed out above, is the stability of a bad result
However, a negative result, as they say, is also a result, with the only conclusion being to scrap it.
Automaton, would you at least explain to me what's going wrong? I don't get it...
If you have something like a PID controller working in relation to the MA as a reference, then there shouldn't be such a flush. You should only learn to calculate the mismatch value or just take a balloon and trade contrends. That's all. The deposit will simply hang around the initial value. And then... This is where magic comes in and this is not the point.
This is not the point we're talking about. Maybe the Masters will help.
A steady loss is a grail if you invert. Eh, if there was a service to subscribe to a signal with inverted trades, I would subscribe to Automat:))
What is there to subscribe?
The risk is too high, and you may invert or not invert it, and you will be drained.
The risk can only be increased if you know how to work against drawdowns.
Personally, I do not observe anything in this system, except the search for entry accuracy.
I have never seen anything like this, because the market is chaotic, i.e. one who goes in for the woods, another who goes out for the woods (flat sections).
and it is precisely at such times that the probability of a correct entry is 1/2, i.e. an error must never be ignored and one must be able to work against a very likely drawdown.
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
The " battle of the traders"competition
start 01.11.2020.
Task:finish 30.11.2020.
Increase the initial deposit up to 100 times.
And preferably without losing trades.
C - stability.
it's not even funny anymore
+
After all, Success is the ability to move from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm...
Come on, come on, Automat. Don't listen to anyone.
After all, Success is the ability to move from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm...
Success is at least a fraction of a percent improvement on a previous result
and here, rightly pointed out above, is the stability of a bad result
However, a negative result, as they say, is also a result, with the only conclusion being to scrap it.Success is at least a fraction of a percent improvement on a previous result
And here, as correctly noted above, it is the stability of a bad result.
However, a negative result, as they say, is also a result, with the only conclusion - screw that.Stable loss is a grail if you invert.
Eh, if there was a service - sign up for a signal with inverted trades, I would sign up for the Automat :))
A steady loss is a grail if you invert.
Eh, if there was a service - sign up for a signal with inverted trades, I would sign up for the Automat:))
There would still be a loss.
Profit is half a poke and the loss grows for as long as the deposit lasts.
There will still be a loss.
Profit springs in half a poke and loss grows for as long as the deposit lasts.
"no faq" as they say)
The system is a "tractor", not a "machine gun", and the spread and commissions are not lost by leaps and bounds.
That's amazing.
Automaton, would you at least explain to me what's going wrong? I don't get it...
If you have something like a PID controller working in relation to the MA as a reference, then there shouldn't be such a flush. You should only learn to calculate the mismatch value or just take a balloon and trade contrends. That's all. The deposit will simply hang around the initial value. And then... This is where magic comes in and this is not the point.
This is not the point we're talking about. Maybe the Masters will help.
A steady loss is a grail if you invert.
Eh, if there was a service to subscribe to a signal with inverted trades, I would subscribe to Automat:))
What is there to subscribe?
The risk is too high, and you may invert or not invert it, and you will be drained.
The risk can only be increased if you know how to work against drawdowns.
Personally, I do not observe anything in this system, except the search for entry accuracy.
I have never seen anything like this, because the market is chaotic, i.e. one who goes in for the woods, another who goes out for the woods (flat sections).
and it is precisely at such times that the probability of a correct entry is 1/2, i.e. an error must never be ignored and one must be able to work against a very likely drawdown.