Well, some people might think something, but I know what I'm doing and how I'm doing it.
One does not exclude the other. You can, say, consider it as a particle and a trajectory, or you can consider it as a wave packet. In many cases the results will be identical, but not all.
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
1. I don't think so.
1. You're not sure about that, but you have doubts, like "what the hell?" ;)) We'll see.
2. I feel like it, I feel like it ;)))
1. You're not sure about that, but you have doubts, like "what the hell?" ;)) We'll see.
2. I feel like it, it's a bliss ;)))
When you're dealing with probabilities you can't be sure of anything. Unlikely events happen all the time. )
Well, I don't base my system on probabilities, as I've said many times here.
When dealing with probabilities it is impossible to be sure of anything. Unlikely events happen all the time. )
Prigozhin renormalisation of probabilities)
Well, I'm not basing my system on probabilities, as I've said many times here.
It only seems that way.
Well, some people may think something, but I know what I'm doing and how I'm doing it.
Well, some people might think something, but I know what I'm doing and how I'm doing it.
there's another rant and rave
gone
there's another rant and rave
gone