When does it make sense to keep part of the robot code in an indicator? - page 27

 
Integer:
Moderators, time to end this nonsense!


Vinin tried to be specific, it didn't work.

TheXpert clearly stipulated what the problem might be. But disagreed on the REAL conditions.

Integer showed a lack of reasoning skills. Nothing but snot.

The speed characteristics have never been investigated.

 
Integer:

You're shitting me! That's not what I promised!

OK pardon me, it was the other way around, I give you the EMA in the EA and you hook it up with the inductor. Right? Page 8.
 
hrenfx:


Vinin tried to be specific, it didn't work.

TheXpert clearly stipulated what the problem might be. But disagreed on the REAL conditions.

Integer showed a lack of reasoning skills. Nothing but snot.

The speed characteristics were never investigated.


Not "didn't work out", didn't see fit.

 
Andrei01:
It's all on this page.
 
Integer:


Not "didn't work out", didn't see fit.

I mean, did it work?
 
hrenfx:
You mean it worked?

How can you talk about whether it worked or not about something you didn't do?
 
hrenfx:
Everything is on this page.

Yes, it's almost all ready, but we just need to loop the calculation and measure the system time.

Next we need to take Dmitri by the gills to do his part as promised and transfer it to the turkey. (He has of course chosen an easier task to use all the ready-made stuff).

 
Integer:

How can you talk about whether it worked or not about something you didn't do?

Then I'll reword it:

Vinin was not trying to be specific.

 
You don't have to take anyone by the gills. On that page you can see the source code for both variants.
 
hrenfx:

Then I'll reword it:

Vinin was not trying to be specific.


Are you sane or not? No one has tried because they don't think they should.
Reason: