Andrei01: I have already cited my evidence, no one has challenged it yet. But there is nothing to show, even though it is supposedly easy. Why is that?
Simply, I can prove both (and so can Integer). But it will not mean that we or YOU are right. It will only talk about the way a particular model is implemented
Dear Sir, there has to be a reasonable beginning in all actions. So why refer to the price through the indicator when you can refer to it directly from the indicator?
Dear fellow, there must be a reasonable beginning in all the warehouses. So, why apply to the price through the indicator, if you can apply to it directly from the indicator?
The only difference is that somewhere else the iCustom appears. The only difference is that iCustom appears somewhere else.
This example is just able to demonstrate the speed change when iCustom is called.
Both in the Expert Advisor and in the indicator the prices are initially called, and then both of them make the same calculations. The only difference is that iCustom appears somewhere else.
The above example is able to demonstrate the change of the speed when using iCustom.
You seem to be concerned exclusively with yourself and do not see anything that is going on around you. Read the topic more carefully.
I see only one solution. The author of this thread will give his variant of EA with EMA, Integer will give his variant. If there are no variants in 30 minutes, the topic will be deleted as flooding and the author will be banned for a week.
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
I have already cited my evidence, no one has challenged it yet. But there is nothing to show, even though it is supposedly easy. Why is that?
Simply, I can prove both (and so can Integer). But it will not mean that we or YOU are right. It will only talk about the way a particular model is implemented
Dear Sir, there has to be a reasonable beginning in all actions. So why refer to the price through the indicator when you can refer to it directly from the indicator?
(Sorry, Dimitri, error corrected)
I have already given my proof
I have already cited my evidence, no one has challenged it yet. But there's nothing to show, even though it's supposedly easy.
I think we can end this discussion at this point if there is nothing concrete.
Where is your evidence? Is it those fatalities about CPU operations? If there was your consent to participate in the competition.
Dear fellow, there must be a reasonable beginning in all the warehouses. So, why apply to the price through the indicator, if you can apply to it directly from the indicator?
The only difference is that somewhere else the iCustom appears. The only difference is that iCustom appears somewhere else.
This example is just able to demonstrate the speed change when iCustom is called.
Both in the Expert Advisor and in the indicator the prices are initially called, and then both of them make the same calculations. The only difference is that iCustom appears somewhere else.
The above example is able to demonstrate the change of the speed when using iCustom.
You seem to be concerned exclusively with yourself and do not see anything that is going on around you. Read the topic more carefully.
This example is exactly able to demonstrate the change of speed when using iCustom.
But not when performing indicator calculations (calculations using chart data) in an indicator or in an Expert Advisor.
It seems that you wrote about some non-trivial indicators...
As soon as you post your EMA indicator with the EA, I will post the EMA EA without the indicator.