When does it make sense to keep part of the robot code in an indicator? - page 25

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Learn how to argue.
You imagine I do.
By the way, where is your promised version of the Expert Advisor to be hooked up to the indicator? I can't find it anywhere.
In general, the discussion has gone to the wrong place, because the problem of connection and history swapping is not discussed here, but only performance measurement on any random data through the indicator and directly in the code.
Look more closely.
And the EMA has a window!
Litmus.
Eliminate your illiteracy.
Look more closely.
But again, I'm talking about REAL conditions. You only run the EA when you are sure that all the history has been uploaded. And my EA will react perfectly correctly to short-term disruptions in communication.
No, this is not a conversation. When they talk about real, they are talking about avoiding possible problems and overlaps.
It feels like you either haven't traded on the real, or haven't lost money on your own negligence yet.
In fact, this is not the place to discuss the problem of communication and history paging, but to measure performance on any random input through an indicator and directly in the code.
Couldn't find it anywhere, what page was it on?
What am I, your personal secretary?
It feels like you either haven't traded on the real world, or haven't lost money on your own negligence yet.