[Archive! - page 523
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Nah, he was mad because he didn't have a bike (c)
for New Year's Eve, he'll get better at it.
RBK reported that Zhirinovsky's wife earned more money than he did, so he's obviously being stifled by greed)))
Shoes and a fur coat and other valuables are all he can give. Girls usually need other things to be happy.
For happiness, yes. But if a woman has a choice between a poor romantic and a rich and generous man, she will choose the rich man. She will live with a rich man and have children with him, confident that her children will be well-fed and provided for.
This is natural and normal. These are the principles of human survival as a species. It is the same in animals - females prefer strong, brave, bright males to frail weak romantics - romantics cannot protect and feed the female and her cubs. If it were otherwise, man would have been extinct long ago.
Well, only innocent or not very sinful girls do :) Attention, love, understanding, admiration, a cozy hut for two. But then these girls quickly realize what it's all about and they turn into what he says. There is no love or romance left; only bargaining for access to the body remains. Of course not everyone is like that, but others are more the exception :(
And Zhirik is a crossachiever. But he is loved because he is Zhirik.
Zhirik says all the right things, ....
Zhirik says everything right, most of the time. He is too harsh, too direct - it makes his words cringe, his words look grotesque, which is why he is disliked.
If he were spoken by a different person, in different words, the meaning would be perceived very differently.
What did he say wrong, that his wife is only interested in a fur coat and boots? - Well, it's true. And all in the same vein. He focuses on details so much that the listener ceases to notice the context of the words - that is his problem.
+1 all to the point, harsh, but the point is right
On the other hand, in the villagers' thread you seemed to be defending women when I spoke out with examples about the selfishness and selfishness of most women. What is really your position on this issue?
) And I think his parents treated him badly, thought he was a burden... And he didn't get enough affection, care, love. He can't love because he doesn't know what it is. Unhappy man.
Shoes and a fur coat and other valuables are all he can give. Girls usually need other things to be happy.
Come on, you're pouring it on )))) Unfortunately, there are hardly any girls like that, they are dying out like mammoths, many of them have already put their feelings down because of their stupidity.
PS- I don't subscribe to absolutely everyone, but most are almost absolute-fact.
Nah, it's funny, and vedb in almost the whole video is also correct.
Usually your posts are excessively long, although that doesn't help to make it clear what you're talking about. And in this case you are too laconic and decided that one word is enough. Again, it is difficult to understand what you mean.
The magic of the fucking Russian language))), and no cheating
You are confused about something. I am not defending anyone (and I am not attacking anyone) - neither women nor men. They are two completely different beings, albeit of the same species, with different goals and different motives (harmony is possible only if a man and a woman understand that they are different, awareness of this fact is the way to happiness and harmony). But for some reason, not everyone has an understanding of this "difference".
That's right.