Catching a reversal or correction - page 32

 
Gerasimm:
...my respects.) I completely agree with you and it's good that they're breaking even... We are moving in the same direction, there are some innovations.

Wow!!! Looks like the secret whispers in the darkest, darkest corners are starting.... :))

And what about the public, closely following developments and (so far) modestly silent, but preparing a nuclear bomb in their minds by sifting, testing and debugging some of the core of all your speculations?

 
artmedia70:

Wow!!! Looks like the secret whispers in the darkest, darkest corners are starting.... :))

And what about the public, watching closely the developments and (so far) modestly silent, but preparing a nuclear bomb in their minds by sifting, testing and debugging some of the core of all your speculations?

The core of my deductions is stuck statically in the sifting methods, because the way out of the pose has not been defined yet + I, in particular, am in a slight trip over the land with a terrible Internet, so you can say that in the dark corners nothing terrible has happened :o)... Again, respect... Thinking of a light martin as a lifeline for a large percentage of negative trades...
 
artmedia70:

Wow!!! Looks like the secret whispers in the darkest, darkest corners are starting.... :))

And what about the public, watching closely the developments and (so far) modestly silent, but preparing a nuclear bomb in their minds by sifting, testing and debugging some of the core of all your speculations?

Particularly hilarious is the hypertrophied attention to the whispering and total indifference to the development of the topic. Voyeurism, however. :)
 
tara:
Particularly hilarious hypertrophied attention to whispering and total indifference to the development of the topic. Voyeurism, though. :)

:) It's only the appearance of complete indifference, which, by the way, is only denied by the fact that there was a reaction to the "whispering" :)

There's just not much to say yet - everything is brewing in a cauldron of thought, trial and error. Quietly, under the covers.

And to be serious, some things are being made quietly, based on the principles given here. Separate fragments of code don't need to be thrown out here.

And when everything is assembled, then we'll deal with it...

 
artmedia70:

:) It's only the appearance of complete indifference, which, by the way, is only denied by the fact that there was a reaction to the "whispering" :)

There's just not much to say yet - everything is brewing in a cauldron of thought, trial and error. Quietly, under the covers...

And if seriously, some things are quietly getting done, based on the principles outlined here. Individual pieces of code don't need to be dumped here.

And when it's all assembled, then we'll sort it out...

imho, there's nothing to code yet. The model is just that - a model, in order to work out a trading system in the process of creating its research prototype. For this purpose we need to test it with different sets of parameters (we'll have about a hundred of them), understand and feel the process, thoroughly discuss the results and possible solutions, etc. Then the huskiness will be eliminated and a simple, coherent and intelligible scheme will be born that can be used to create a normal Expert Advisor.

For now, people have sluggishly participated in a superficial discussion and took a wait-and-see attitude, and some began to brew hail. The grail is as ant's to the sun, although the prospect is not bad. Well, since the forum is not a place for communication between two people, the discussion slowly moved to a private meeting.

 
Here, by the way, is the extreme version.
 
tara:
Hello!

Sorry for the flubbing off-topic.
Sorry to address you as well, but I understand that you are a mathematician. If you don't mind giving your opinion on this article, it's short.

Files:
kywl.zip  17 kb
 
ZetM:

Sorry for the flubbing off-topic.
I'm also sorry to address you, but I understand that you are a mathematician. If you don't mind telling me what you think of this article, it's short.

1. I'm not a mathematician, I'm a cyberneticist. :)

2. What is this thing to read?

 
tara:

2. With what to read this thing?


It's WORD.

 
About the article: I didn't like it.